Factors influencing consultation length in general practice: conversation analysis and econometric models

Background A standard General Practice (GP) consultation falls under Level B of the Medicare Benefit Scheme (six to 20 minutes) with consultations averaging 10-15minutes. This imposes time constraints on the consultation, that could be a limiting for patients with multiple or complex concerns. This limitation may lead GPs to compromise on the quality of care either by inadequately addressing patient’s concerns by prioritising time or by extending consultations and running late due to systemic pressures in the consultation length model.Objectives This study of communication in healthcare adopts a novel approach to assess how external factors, such as patient age and education, and internal factors, such as how multiple medical concerns were raised, impact the length of general practice consultations.Design This study used a mixed-method design using conversation analysis and econometric models to explore the influence of external factors and internal factors affecting consultation length.Setting This study use data available for secondary analysis from three General Practice (GP) Clinics in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, collected between 2018 and 2019.Participants Forty-one consultations across three GPs were video recorded, with linked patient surveys. All participants were 18 years and older and spoke English fluently.Results Both external and internal factors affect consultation length. Older patients (35–64 years-old & 65-85 + years-old) had shorter consultations than younger patients (18–34 years-old). Patients with tertiary education had shorter consultation length than patients with only High School Certificate/School Certificate qualifications. Consultations with agenda setting to establish a medical concerns list and consultations which had a clear “driver” were shorter.Conclusions Factors beyond number of medical concerns presented can influence GP consultation length. Thus, the standard length of consultation could be limiting not only for patients with several presenting concerns or single complicated concerns, but also for those who may otherwise benefit from a longer consultation time, such as younger people. Future policy development and workload planning should consider aspects of patient age and education when determining consultation length. As internal conversational factors can reduce consultation length, training for GPs in specific consultation approaches may also improve efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28355245.2025.2583750
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing consultation length in general practice: conversation analysis and econometric models

Kompal Sinha, Sarah J. White, Irene C. L. Simpson
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Factors influencing consultation length in general practice: conversation analysis and econometric models

Kompal Sinha, Sarah J. White, Irene C. L. Simpson
article en

Abstract

Background A standard General Practice (GP) consultation falls under Level B of the Medicare Benefit Scheme (six to 20 minutes) with consultations averaging 10-15minutes. This imposes time constraints on the consultation, that could be a limiting for patients with multiple or complex concerns. This limitation may lead GPs to compromise on the quality of care either by inadequately addressing patient’s concerns by prioritising time or by extending consultations and running late due to systemic pressures in the consultation length model.Objectives This study of communication in healthcare adopts a novel approach to assess how external factors, such as patient age and education, and internal factors, such as how multiple medical concerns were raised, impact the length of general practice consultations.Design This study used a mixed-method design using conversation analysis and econometric models to explore the influence of external factors and internal factors affecting consultation length.Setting This study use data available for secondary analysis from three General Practice (GP) Clinics in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, collected between 2018 and 2019.Participants Forty-one consultations across three GPs were video recorded, with linked patient surveys. All participants were 18 years and older and spoke English fluently.Results Both external and internal factors affect consultation length. Older patients (35–64 years-old & 65-85 + years-old) had shorter consultations than younger patients (18–34 years-old). Patients with tertiary education had shorter consultation length than patients with only High School Certificate/School Certificate qualifications. Consultations with agenda setting to establish a medical concerns list and consultations which had a clear “driver” were shorter.Conclusions Factors beyond number of medical concerns presented can influence GP consultation length. Thus, the standard length of consultation could be limiting not only for patients with several presenting concerns or single complicated concerns, but also for those who may otherwise benefit from a longer consultation time, such as younger people. Future policy development and workload planning should consider aspects of patient age and education when determining consultation length. As internal conversational factors can reduce consultation length, training for GPs in specific consultation approaches may also improve efficiency.

Health Literacy and Communication OpenVol. 3(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.