Comparison of Efficacy and Durability of Three Desensitising Agents in Non Carious Non Restorable Lesions: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity arises from stimulus transmission across exposed dentin, leading to pain through a hydrodynamic mechanism. The primary goal in treating this condition is to provide immediate and lasting pain relief while restoring the impermeability of dentinal tubules. However, an ideal desensitising agent has yet to be identified. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Admira Protect, Gluma Desensitizer, and Seal&Protect as an antihypersensitive agent in non carious, non restorable lesions and the durability of the bond for one, three and six months. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was carried out in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics at K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, from January 2016 to July 2017, with 90 teeth from 27 patients randomly assigned to one of three groups, each containing at least 30 teeth with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher. Admira Protect-group A (n=30); Seal&Protectgroup B (n=30), and Gluma Desensitiser-group C (n=30). Dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated using tactile, thermal (cold), and evaporative stimuli at four time points: baseline, immediately after treatment, and at one, three, and six months post-treatment. Sensitivity levels were recorded using a VAS. The experimental agents were applied by a co-investigator per the manufacturer’s instructions, while the principal investigator assessed sensitivity at all time points. Data were analysed using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests. Results: All three treatment groups demonstrated significant differences (p-value <0.05) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and during the 3 months and 6 months follow-ups. A statistically significant difference was observed between Admira Protect (A) and Gluma Desensitiser (C). However, no significant differences were found between Admira Protect (A) and Seal&Protect (B), or between Seal&Protect (B) and Gluma Desensitiser (C). Overall, all three agents proved effective for approximately six months. Conclusion: Admira Protect demonstrated a statistically significantly greater reduction in dentin hypersensitivity compared to Gluma Desensitiser, particularly at immediate, 1-month, and 3-month assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/77568.22177
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Efficacy and Durability of Three Desensitising Agents in Non Carious Non Restorable Lesions: A Randomised Clinical Study

Sankalp Mahajan, Vishnu Pratap Singh Rathore, Anuja Bhavsar, Nimisha Shah et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Comparison of Efficacy and Durability of Three Desensitising Agents in Non Carious Non Restorable Lesions: A Randomised Clinical Study

Sankalp Mahajan, Vishnu Pratap Singh Rathore, Anuja Bhavsar, Nimisha Shah, Meetkumar Dedania
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity arises from stimulus transmission across exposed dentin, leading to pain through a hydrodynamic mechanism. The primary goal in treating this condition is to provide immediate and lasting pain relief while restoring the impermeability of dentinal tubules. However, an ideal desensitising agent has yet to be identified. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Admira Protect, Gluma Desensitizer, and Seal&Protect as an antihypersensitive agent in non carious, non restorable lesions and the durability of the bond for one, three and six months. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was carried out in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics at K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, from January 2016 to July 2017, with 90 teeth from 27 patients randomly assigned to one of three groups, each containing at least 30 teeth with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 4 or higher. Admira Protect-group A (n=30); Seal&Protectgroup B (n=30), and Gluma Desensitiser-group C (n=30). Dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated using tactile, thermal (cold), and evaporative stimuli at four time points: baseline, immediately after treatment, and at one, three, and six months post-treatment. Sensitivity levels were recorded using a VAS. The experimental agents were applied by a co-investigator per the manufacturer’s instructions, while the principal investigator assessed sensitivity at all time points. Data were analysed using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests. Results: All three treatment groups demonstrated significant differences (p-value <0.05) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and during the 3 months and 6 months follow-ups. A statistically significant difference was observed between Admira Protect (A) and Gluma Desensitiser (C). However, no significant differences were found between Admira Protect (A) and Seal&Protect (B), or between Seal&Protect (B) and Gluma Desensitiser (C). Overall, all three agents proved effective for approximately six months. Conclusion: Admira Protect demonstrated a statistically significantly greater reduction in dentin hypersensitivity compared to Gluma Desensitiser, particularly at immediate, 1-month, and 3-month assessments.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.