Becoming Speciesist: How Children and Adults Differ in Valuing Animals by Species and Cognitive Capacity

Children morally prioritize humans over animals less than adults do. Is this because children are less speciesist-meaning they place less moral weight on mere species membership? Or is it because they give less weight to differences in cognitive capacity between humans and other animals? We investigated this in two experiments, presenting children and adult participants in the United States and Spain with moral trade-off dilemmas. These dilemmas involved individuals who varied in species membership (human vs. monkey) and cognitive capacity. Across both cultures, children were less likely than adults to prioritize humans over animals, regardless of cognitive capacity. In addition, participants tended to prioritize individuals with higher cognitive capacities, regardless of species membership-though this effect was less robust in children. Our findings suggest that children in these Western contexts are indeed less speciesist than adults, though they do not rule out developmental changes in the moral weight assigned to cognitive capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251373108
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Becoming Speciesist: How Children and Adults Differ in Valuing Animals by Species and Cognitive Capacity

Luke McGuire, Antonio José Rojas Tejada, Matti Wilks, Lucius Caviola et al.
4 citations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
5.72
article

Becoming Speciesist: How Children and Adults Differ in Valuing Animals by Species and Cognitive Capacity

Luke McGuire, Antonio José Rojas Tejada, Matti Wilks, Lucius Caviola, Jorge L. Ordóñez-Carrasco, Nadira S. Faber, Claudia Suárez-Yera, María Sánchez‐Castelló, Paul Bloom, Guy Kahane, Carter Allen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Children morally prioritize humans over animals less than adults do. Is this because children are less speciesist-meaning they place less moral weight on mere species membership? Or is it because they give less weight to differences in cognitive capacity between humans and other animals? We investigated this in two experiments, presenting children and adult participants in the United States and Spain with moral trade-off dilemmas. These dilemmas involved individuals who varied in species membership (human vs. monkey) and cognitive capacity. Across both cultures, children were less likely than adults to prioritize humans over animals, regardless of cognitive capacity. In addition, participants tended to prioritize individuals with higher cognitive capacities, regardless of species membership-though this effect was less robust in children. Our findings suggest that children in these Western contexts are indeed less speciesist than adults, though they do not rule out developmental changes in the moral weight assigned to cognitive capacity.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Bremen (DE), University of Toronto (CA), University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), University of Oxford (GB), University of Almería (ES), University of California, Berkeley (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.