Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings

Conference travel contributes to the climate footprint of academic research. Here, we provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon emissions associated with conference attendance by analyzing travel data from participants of 10 international conferences in the field of magnetic resonance, namely EUROMAR, ENC and ICMRBS. We find that attending a EUROMAR conference produces, on average, more than 1 t <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>CO</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>eq</mml:mi> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . For the analyzed conferences outside Europe, the corresponding value is about 2-3 times higher, on average, with intercontinental trips amounting to up to 5 t. We compare these conference-related emissions to other activities associated with research and show that conference travel is a substantial portion of the total climate footprint of a researcher in magnetic resonance. We explore several strategies to reduce these emissions, including the impact of selecting conference venues more strategically and the possibility of decentralized conferences. Through a detailed comparison of train versus air travel - accounting for both direct and infrastructure-related emissions - we demonstrate that train travel offers considerable carbon savings. These data may provide a basis for strategic choices of future conferences in the field and for individuals deciding on their conference attendance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-6-243-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings

Natália Ružičková, Georgios Katsaros, Lucky N. Kapoor, Jeroen Dobbelaere et al.
1 citations
Magnetic Resonance
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
4.20
article

Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings

Natália Ružičková, Georgios Katsaros, Lucky N. Kapoor, Jeroen Dobbelaere, Paul Schanda, Valentin Leitner, Predrag Živadinović, Maria Anna Sisak, Cecelia Mweka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conference travel contributes to the climate footprint of academic research. Here, we provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon emissions associated with conference attendance by analyzing travel data from participants of 10 international conferences in the field of magnetic resonance, namely EUROMAR, ENC and ICMRBS. We find that attending a EUROMAR conference produces, on average, more than 1 t <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>CO</mml:mi> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mi>eq</mml:mi> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . For the analyzed conferences outside Europe, the corresponding value is about 2-3 times higher, on average, with intercontinental trips amounting to up to 5 t. We compare these conference-related emissions to other activities associated with research and show that conference travel is a substantial portion of the total climate footprint of a researcher in magnetic resonance. We explore several strategies to reduce these emissions, including the impact of selecting conference venues more strategically and the possibility of decentralized conferences. Through a detailed comparison of train versus air travel - accounting for both direct and infrastructure-related emissions - we demonstrate that train travel offers considerable carbon savings. These data may provide a basis for strategic choices of future conferences in the field and for individuals deciding on their conference attendance.

Magnetic ResonanceVol. 6(2)
Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Conferences and Exhibitions Management
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.