Use of AI in Education: Benefits, Risks, and the Case for a 70/30 Integration Model

Artificial intelligence is rapidly permeating education, inspiring enthusiasm for its benefits and caution about its risks. Synthesizing 26 recent studies, we review AI’s adoption across K–12 and higher education, including early AI-literacy initiatives and post-ChatGPT uptake. Evidence highlights key gains—personalized learning, stronger engagement, improved accessibility, and operational efficiency—while also surfacing ethical and pedagogical challenges that demand balanced integration. We propose a 70/30 model in which roughly 70% of learning remains human-led and 30% is AI-augmented, preserving teacher centrality while leveraging automation where it adds value. This article presents the landscape and positive impacts, addresses risks, mitigations, and implementation of the 70/30 approach. Our literature-based analysis underscores the need for strategic, ethical, and human-centered AI use in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management and Quality
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57263/jmq.04.01.20251
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of AI in Education: Benefits, Risks, and the Case for a 70/30 Integration Model

LUPESCU Marian-Ernuț
Journal of Management and Quality
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Use of AI in Education: Benefits, Risks, and the Case for a 70/30 Integration Model

LUPESCU Marian-Ernuț
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly permeating education, inspiring enthusiasm for its benefits and caution about its risks. Synthesizing 26 recent studies, we review AI’s adoption across K–12 and higher education, including early AI-literacy initiatives and post-ChatGPT uptake. Evidence highlights key gains—personalized learning, stronger engagement, improved accessibility, and operational efficiency—while also surfacing ethical and pedagogical challenges that demand balanced integration. We propose a 70/30 model in which roughly 70% of learning remains human-led and 30% is AI-augmented, preserving teacher centrality while leveraging automation where it adds value. This article presents the landscape and positive impacts, addresses risks, mitigations, and implementation of the 70/30 approach. Our literature-based analysis underscores the need for strategic, ethical, and human-centered AI use in education.

Journal of Management and QualityVol. 4(1)
Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.