Who Pays for What Parts of Expert Depositions in Federal Courts? Decisions of Judges in the Northern District of Illinois

This paper provides discussion of the specific language in what was Rule 26(b)(4)(C), and is now Rule 26(b)(4)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with regard to which party in a federal civil litigation matter is responsible for paying which portions of an expert’s time and costs expended in the process of that expert’s deposition. It reviews similarities and differences in reported opinions of several federal judges in the Northern District of Illinois regarding payment of expert witnesses in accordance with this and other related rules and statutes, and attempts to provide insight into what might at times appear to be inconsistencies in their rulings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Rehabilitation Professional
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.146998
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Pays for What Parts of Expert Depositions in Federal Courts? Decisions of Judges in the Northern District of Illinois

Thomas R. Ireland, Kristine S. Slocum
The Rehabilitation Professional
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Who Pays for What Parts of Expert Depositions in Federal Courts? Decisions of Judges in the Northern District of Illinois

Thomas R. Ireland, Kristine S. Slocum
article en

Abstract

This paper provides discussion of the specific language in what was Rule 26(b)(4)(C), and is now Rule 26(b)(4)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with regard to which party in a federal civil litigation matter is responsible for paying which portions of an expert’s time and costs expended in the process of that expert’s deposition. It reviews similarities and differences in reported opinions of several federal judges in the Northern District of Illinois regarding payment of expert witnesses in accordance with this and other related rules and statutes, and attempts to provide insight into what might at times appear to be inconsistencies in their rulings.

The Rehabilitation ProfessionalVol. 26(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.