Clash-of-Leges: A bilingual dataset for conflict detection and explanation in statutory law

• Comprehensive Legal Conflict Dataset: Clash-of-Leges introduces a novel dataset that captures authentic legal conflicts between provisions across different documents, derived from Italian Constitutional Court rulings, to support advanced AI research in legal conflict detection and explanation. • Bilingual and Multi-Task Framework: The dataset includes annotations for three key tasks-Conflict Detection, Conflict Explanation Generation, and Reference Retrieval-while offering bilingual support in Italian and English to enhance global research applicability. • Extensive Evalutions: The manuscript resents an extensive experimental evaluation of several large language models across all defined tasks, illustrating both their capabilities and current limitations. Legal conflicts between statutes or constitutional articles present a significant challenge in maintaining consistency and coherence within legal systems. Addressing these conflicts requires extensive human expertise, making the process labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this paper, we introduce Clash-of-Leges , a novel multilingual dataset derived from rulings by the Constitutional Court of the Italian Republic, designed to aid the automation of conflict detection and explanation between legal articles. We identify three key tasks: Conflict Classification, which determines whether two legal articles are in conflict; Conflict Explanation Generation, which provides detailed explanations for identified conflicts; and Reference Retrieval, which sources relevant legal bases and precedents to substantiate interpretations. These tasks are intended to facilitate the development of AI models that can automatically identify and explain contradictions between legal provisions. 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130182
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clash-of-Leges: A bilingual dataset for conflict detection and explanation in statutory law

Luca Ragazzi, Paolo Italiani, Gianluca Moro
Expert Systems with Applications
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Clash-of-Leges: A bilingual dataset for conflict detection and explanation in statutory law

Luca Ragazzi, Paolo Italiani, Gianluca Moro
article en

Abstract

• Comprehensive Legal Conflict Dataset: Clash-of-Leges introduces a novel dataset that captures authentic legal conflicts between provisions across different documents, derived from Italian Constitutional Court rulings, to support advanced AI research in legal conflict detection and explanation. • Bilingual and Multi-Task Framework: The dataset includes annotations for three key tasks-Conflict Detection, Conflict Explanation Generation, and Reference Retrieval-while offering bilingual support in Italian and English to enhance global research applicability. • Extensive Evalutions: The manuscript resents an extensive experimental evaluation of several large language models across all defined tasks, illustrating both their capabilities and current limitations. Legal conflicts between statutes or constitutional articles present a significant challenge in maintaining consistency and coherence within legal systems. Addressing these conflicts requires extensive human expertise, making the process labor-intensive and time-consuming. In this paper, we introduce Clash-of-Leges , a novel multilingual dataset derived from rulings by the Constitutional Court of the Italian Republic, designed to aid the automation of conflict detection and explanation between legal articles. We identify three key tasks: Conflict Classification, which determines whether two legal articles are in conflict; Conflict Explanation Generation, which provides detailed explanations for identified conflicts; and Reference Retrieval, which sources relevant legal bases and precedents to substantiate interpretations. These tasks are intended to facilitate the development of AI models that can automatically identify and explain contradictions between legal provisions. 2

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 300
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.