Examination of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation Models: Prior Graduate-Level Training and Current Use Per Forensic Setting

The purpose of this study was to examine prior training of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation models within graduate training programs, and (2) evaluate which models are most commonly used dependent on forensic vocational setting. A total of 69 FVCs that were members of the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals (!ARP) organization participated in the current study. Findings showed that RAPEL (64%, n = 44), PEEDS-RAPEL (52%, n = 36), Labor Market Access (49%, n = 34), Vocational and Rehabilitation Assessment Model (45%, n = 31), Deutsch/Sawyer (42%, n = 29), and Field’s Practical Approach (41 %, n = 28) were the models reported that study participants received the most training during their graduate studies (>40%). The RAPEL model (75%, n = 1. 52) and PEEDS-RAPEL model (57%, n = 39) were reported as being most frequently used during the entirety of the participants’ career, regardless of forensic setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Rehabilitation Professional
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.147038
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation Models: Prior Graduate-Level Training and Current Use Per Forensic Setting

Trustee Oakes, Matthew E. Sprong, Lisa W. Thomas, Nicole Fuscaldo et al.
The Rehabilitation Professional
Disability Education and Employment
article

Examination of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation Models: Prior Graduate-Level Training and Current Use Per Forensic Setting

Trustee Oakes, Matthew E. Sprong, Lisa W. Thomas, Nicole Fuscaldo, Jason Purinton
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine prior training of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation models within graduate training programs, and (2) evaluate which models are most commonly used dependent on forensic vocational setting. A total of 69 FVCs that were members of the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals (!ARP) organization participated in the current study. Findings showed that RAPEL (64%, n = 44), PEEDS-RAPEL (52%, n = 36), Labor Market Access (49%, n = 34), Vocational and Rehabilitation Assessment Model (45%, n = 31), Deutsch/Sawyer (42%, n = 29), and Field’s Practical Approach (41 %, n = 28) were the models reported that study participants received the most training during their graduate studies (>40%). The RAPEL model (75%, n = 1. 52) and PEEDS-RAPEL model (57%, n = 39) were reported as being most frequently used during the entirety of the participants’ career, regardless of forensic setting.

The Rehabilitation ProfessionalVol. 31(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examination of Forensic Vocational Rehabilitation Models: Prior Graduate-Level Training and Current Use Per Forensic Setting — Trustee Oakes, Matthew E. Sprong, et al. · The Rehabilitation Professional (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS