Testing Risk Difference of Two Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data

ABSTRACT In clinical studies with paired organs, binary outcomes often exhibit intra‐subject correlation and may include a mixture of unilateral and bilateral observations. Under Donner's constant correlation model, we develop three likelihood‐based test statistics (the likelihood ratio, Wald‐type, and score tests) for assessing the risk difference between two proportions. Simulation studies demonstrate good control of type I error and comparable power among the three tests, with the score test showing slightly more favorable performance, particularly for moderate to large sample sizes, supporting its use in practical applications and future studies involving combined unilateral and bilateral data. Applications to otolaryngologic and ophthalmologic data illustrate the methods. An online calculator is also provided for power analysis and risk difference testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70128
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Testing Risk Difference of Two Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data

Chang‐Xing Ma, Jia Zhou
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Testing Risk Difference of Two Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data

Chang‐Xing Ma, Jia Zhou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In clinical studies with paired organs, binary outcomes often exhibit intra‐subject correlation and may include a mixture of unilateral and bilateral observations. Under Donner's constant correlation model, we develop three likelihood‐based test statistics (the likelihood ratio, Wald‐type, and score tests) for assessing the risk difference between two proportions. Simulation studies demonstrate good control of type I error and comparable power among the three tests, with the score test showing slightly more favorable performance, particularly for moderate to large sample sizes, supporting its use in practical applications and future studies involving combined unilateral and bilateral data. Applications to otolaryngologic and ophthalmologic data illustrate the methods. An online calculator is also provided for power analysis and risk difference testing.

Pharmaceutical StatisticsVol. 25(6)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing Risk Difference of Two Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data — Chang‐Xing Ma, Jia Zhou · Pharmaceutical Statistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS