Regional development traps in Europe: a study of occupational trajectories of regions

Abstract This paper presents an evolutionary perspective on regional development traps that centres around the structural inability of regions to develop new and complex occupations. Using the European Labour Force Survey, we follow occupational trajectories of 237 European regions and provide evidence on which regions are trapped, what kinds of traps they have fallen into and which regions have managed to escape such traps. We find a clear-cut divide in Europe: Almost all non-trapped regions are in Northern and Western Europe, while trapped regions are found primarily in Southern and Eastern Europe. However, this geographical divide does not apply to all types of regional traps. Our results also show that regional development traps are persistent: Regions often remain in the same trap, but not always. Our study suggests a feasible pathway for low-complexity regions to overcome a development trap is by building capabilities in related occupations and then diversifying into complex occupations. Once complexity levels are high, regions tend not to lose their complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaf040
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional development traps in Europe: a study of occupational trajectories of regions

Milene Simone Tessarin, Sergio Petralia, R.A. Boschma, Deyu Li
2 citations
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
6.26
article

Regional development traps in Europe: a study of occupational trajectories of regions

Milene Simone Tessarin, Sergio Petralia, R.A. Boschma, Deyu Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents an evolutionary perspective on regional development traps that centres around the structural inability of regions to develop new and complex occupations. Using the European Labour Force Survey, we follow occupational trajectories of 237 European regions and provide evidence on which regions are trapped, what kinds of traps they have fallen into and which regions have managed to escape such traps. We find a clear-cut divide in Europe: Almost all non-trapped regions are in Northern and Western Europe, while trapped regions are found primarily in Southern and Eastern Europe. However, this geographical divide does not apply to all types of regional traps. Our results also show that regional development traps are persistent: Regions often remain in the same trap, but not always. Our study suggests a feasible pathway for low-complexity regions to overcome a development trap is by building capabilities in related occupations and then diversifying into complex occupations. Once complexity levels are high, regions tend not to lose their complexity.

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and SocietyVol. 19(1)
Utrecht University (NL), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regional development traps in Europe: a study of occupational trajectories of regions — Milene Simone Tessarin, Sergio Petralia, et al. · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS