Developing a weight-of-evidence methodology for persistence assessment of substances in the environment

The environmental persistence of a substance plays a key role in determining its exposure to humans and other organisms, making this an important component in the risk assessment and management of chemicals. Regulatory persistence assessments generally involve a comparison of degradation half-lives against threshold criteria for different environmental compartments, typically water, sediment, and soil. Half-lives are commonly determined using OECD guideline biodegradation simulation tests. Other information may be considered relevant to persistence assessments, such as results from biodegradation screening tests, quantitative structure-activity relationships, field studies, monitoring data, and nonstandard laboratory experiments. All available relevant information should be considered together in a weight-of-evidence approach, but clear guidance is currently lacking both for evaluating the quality of individual studies and for combining these in a single weight-of-evidence determination. Here, we propose a systematic methodology to collate, evaluate, and integrate relevant information to reach robust, transparent, and consistent conclusions for persistence assessments. First, the quality (reliability and relevance) of individual studies within each information category, or "line of evidence," is evaluated using a novel scoring methodology. Then, information from different studies is combined to determine outcomes for each line of evidence. Finally, a stepwise weight-of-evidence approach is applied to integrate outcomes from different lines of evidence to reach an overall conclusion for the persistence assessment. Consistency of information is evaluated at various stages in line with weight-of-evidence best practice. The methodology has been developed in accordance with principles of the European Union Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulatory framework, test guidelines, and guidance, while being flexible to accommodate different regulatory practices. The methodology has been implemented in a freely available Excel-based software tool, the Persistence Assessment Tool (PAT), and is demonstrated using a case study substance hexabromocyclododecane.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf139
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a weight-of-evidence methodology for persistence assessment of substances in the environment

Dik van de Meent, John R. Parsons, Christopher B. Hughes, Delina Y. Lyon et al.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Developing a weight-of-evidence methodology for persistence assessment of substances in the environment

Dik van de Meent, John R. Parsons, Christopher B. Hughes, Delina Y. Lyon, Megan Griffiths, Amelie Ott, Simon Cook
article en

Abstract

The environmental persistence of a substance plays a key role in determining its exposure to humans and other organisms, making this an important component in the risk assessment and management of chemicals. Regulatory persistence assessments generally involve a comparison of degradation half-lives against threshold criteria for different environmental compartments, typically water, sediment, and soil. Half-lives are commonly determined using OECD guideline biodegradation simulation tests. Other information may be considered relevant to persistence assessments, such as results from biodegradation screening tests, quantitative structure-activity relationships, field studies, monitoring data, and nonstandard laboratory experiments. All available relevant information should be considered together in a weight-of-evidence approach, but clear guidance is currently lacking both for evaluating the quality of individual studies and for combining these in a single weight-of-evidence determination. Here, we propose a systematic methodology to collate, evaluate, and integrate relevant information to reach robust, transparent, and consistent conclusions for persistence assessments. First, the quality (reliability and relevance) of individual studies within each information category, or "line of evidence," is evaluated using a novel scoring methodology. Then, information from different studies is combined to determine outcomes for each line of evidence. Finally, a stepwise weight-of-evidence approach is applied to integrate outcomes from different lines of evidence to reach an overall conclusion for the persistence assessment. Consistency of information is evaluated at various stages in line with weight-of-evidence best practice. The methodology has been developed in accordance with principles of the European Union Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulatory framework, test guidelines, and guidance, while being flexible to accommodate different regulatory practices. The methodology has been implemented in a freely available Excel-based software tool, the Persistence Assessment Tool (PAT), and is demonstrated using a case study substance hexabromocyclododecane.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementVol. 22(2)
Ricardo (United Kingdom) (GB), Concawe (BE), Cosmetics Europe (BE), Association of Clinical Scientists (US)
European Chemical Industry Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.