Development of a computable phenotype to identify a transgender sample for health research purposes: a feasibility study in a large linked provincial healthcare administrative cohort in British Columbia, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Innovative methods are needed for identification of transgender people in administrative records for health research purposes. This study investigated the feasibility of using transgender-specific healthcare utilisation in a Canadian population-based health records database to develop a computable phenotype (CP) and identify the proportion of transgender people within the HIV-positive population as a public health priority. DESIGN: The Comparative Outcomes and Service Utilization Trends (COAST) Study cohort comprises a data linkage between two provincial data sources: The British Columbia (BC) Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program, which coordinates HIV treatment dispensation across BC and Population Data BC, a provincial data repository holding individual, longitudinal data for all BC residents (1996-2013). SETTING: British Columbia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: COAST participants include 13 907 BC residents living with HIV (≥19 years of age) and a 10% random sample comparison group of the HIV-negative general population (514 952 individuals). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare records were used to identify transgender people via a CP algorithm (diagnosis codes+androgen blocker/hormone prescriptions), to examine related diagnoses and prescription concordance and to validate the CP using an independent provider-reported transgender status measure. Demographics and chronic illness burden were also characterised for the transgender sample. RESULTS: The best-performing CP identified 137 HIV-negative and 51 HIV-positive transgender people (total 188). In validity analyses, the best-performing CP had low sensitivity (27.5%, 95% CI: 17.8% to 39.8%), high specificity (99.8%, 95% CI: 99.6% to 99.8%), low agreement using Kappa statistics (0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5) and moderate positive predictive value (43.2%, 95% CI: 28.7% to 58.9%). There was high concordance between exogenous sex hormone use and transgender-specific diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a validated CP opens up new opportunities for identifying transgender people for inclusion in population-based health research using administrative health data, and offers the potential for much-needed and heretofore unavailable evidence on health status, including HIV status, and the healthcare use and needs of transgender people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/jt9n-wc15
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a computable phenotype to identify a transgender sample for health research purposes: a feasibility study in a large linked provincial healthcare administrative cohort in British Columbia, Canada

Travis Salway, Robert S. Hogg, Ashleigh J. Rich, Tonia Poteat et al.
UNC Libraries
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Development of a computable phenotype to identify a transgender sample for health research purposes: a feasibility study in a large linked provincial healthcare administrative cohort in British Columbia, Canada

Travis Salway, Robert S. Hogg, Ashleigh J. Rich, Tonia Poteat, Mieke Koehoorn, Paul Sereda, Monica Ye, Jenny Li
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Innovative methods are needed for identification of transgender people in administrative records for health research purposes. This study investigated the feasibility of using transgender-specific healthcare utilisation in a Canadian population-based health records database to develop a computable phenotype (CP) and identify the proportion of transgender people within the HIV-positive population as a public health priority. DESIGN: The Comparative Outcomes and Service Utilization Trends (COAST) Study cohort comprises a data linkage between two provincial data sources: The British Columbia (BC) Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program, which coordinates HIV treatment dispensation across BC and Population Data BC, a provincial data repository holding individual, longitudinal data for all BC residents (1996-2013). SETTING: British Columbia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: COAST participants include 13 907 BC residents living with HIV (≥19 years of age) and a 10% random sample comparison group of the HIV-negative general population (514 952 individuals). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare records were used to identify transgender people via a CP algorithm (diagnosis codes+androgen blocker/hormone prescriptions), to examine related diagnoses and prescription concordance and to validate the CP using an independent provider-reported transgender status measure. Demographics and chronic illness burden were also characterised for the transgender sample. RESULTS: The best-performing CP identified 137 HIV-negative and 51 HIV-positive transgender people (total 188). In validity analyses, the best-performing CP had low sensitivity (27.5%, 95% CI: 17.8% to 39.8%), high specificity (99.8%, 95% CI: 99.6% to 99.8%), low agreement using Kappa statistics (0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5) and moderate positive predictive value (43.2%, 95% CI: 28.7% to 58.9%). There was high concordance between exogenous sex hormone use and transgender-specific diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a validated CP opens up new opportunities for identifying transgender people for inclusion in population-based health research using administrative health data, and offers the potential for much-needed and heretofore unavailable evidence on health status, including HIV status, and the healthcare use and needs of transgender people.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.