Standardized benchmarking of advanced oxidation processes for tetracycline degradation with life cycle assessment and economic evaluation

The growing prevalence of antibiotic contaminants in water systems demands advanced treatment solutions, yet most evaluations of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) focus narrowly on degradation efficiency while neglecting sustainability trade-offs. This study provides a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic evaluation comparing five AOPs—sonolysis, photolysis, sonophotolysis, Fenton-like oxidation, and electrochemical treatment—for tetracycline degradation in wastewater. Using a standardized functional unit (90 % removal from 1 L of 40 ppm tetracycline solution), we integrate operational data with monetized environmental impacts and operating costs. The analysis reveals significant trade-offs between degradation efficiency and sustainability metrics: while sonochemical treatment achieved the fastest degradation kinetics, it exhibited high environmental burden under current grid electricity conditions. Optimizing the energy efficiency of sonoreactor is the key to improving its sustainability and potentially make it as the most sustainable and affordable option. Fenton oxidation demonstrated slower reaction rates but low carbon footprint and the second favourable economic profile. Electrochemical treatment emerged as the least sustainable option, with platinum electrode production contributing >70 % of total environmental impacts. Sensitivity analysis identified two critical leverage points: (1) catalyst reusability, showing potential for 70 % reduction in CO 2 -equivalent emissions, and (2) electricity carbon intensity, which significantly altered technology rankings. Environmental damage monetization revealed that indirect cost accounted for up to 55 % of total process costs, a frequently overlooked factor in conventional assessments. These findings underscore the need for integrated environmental-economic frameworks in AOP development, moving beyond operational performance to evaluate technologies through combined operational, environmental, and economic lenses. • First standardized LCA and economic evaluation of five AOPs for tetracycline degradation, revealing key sustainability trade-offs • Catalyst production and material sourcing incur up to 90% environmental impacts. • With energy-efficient reactors and green electricity, sonolysis becomes the most sustainable and affordable option • Indirect environmental costs contribute up to 55% of total treatment expenses • Catalyst reuse and green energy can reduce emissions by 70%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.170664
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized benchmarking of advanced oxidation processes for tetracycline degradation with life cycle assessment and economic evaluation

Yihao Huang, Zhiyuan Zong, James Kwan, Nicholas P. Hankins
1 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Advanced oxidation water treatment
0.82
article

Standardized benchmarking of advanced oxidation processes for tetracycline degradation with life cycle assessment and economic evaluation

Yihao Huang, Zhiyuan Zong, James Kwan, Nicholas P. Hankins
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing prevalence of antibiotic contaminants in water systems demands advanced treatment solutions, yet most evaluations of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) focus narrowly on degradation efficiency while neglecting sustainability trade-offs. This study provides a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic evaluation comparing five AOPs—sonolysis, photolysis, sonophotolysis, Fenton-like oxidation, and electrochemical treatment—for tetracycline degradation in wastewater. Using a standardized functional unit (90 % removal from 1 L of 40 ppm tetracycline solution), we integrate operational data with monetized environmental impacts and operating costs. The analysis reveals significant trade-offs between degradation efficiency and sustainability metrics: while sonochemical treatment achieved the fastest degradation kinetics, it exhibited high environmental burden under current grid electricity conditions. Optimizing the energy efficiency of sonoreactor is the key to improving its sustainability and potentially make it as the most sustainable and affordable option. Fenton oxidation demonstrated slower reaction rates but low carbon footprint and the second favourable economic profile. Electrochemical treatment emerged as the least sustainable option, with platinum electrode production contributing >70 % of total environmental impacts. Sensitivity analysis identified two critical leverage points: (1) catalyst reusability, showing potential for 70 % reduction in CO 2 -equivalent emissions, and (2) electricity carbon intensity, which significantly altered technology rankings. Environmental damage monetization revealed that indirect cost accounted for up to 55 % of total process costs, a frequently overlooked factor in conventional assessments. These findings underscore the need for integrated environmental-economic frameworks in AOP development, moving beyond operational performance to evaluate technologies through combined operational, environmental, and economic lenses. • First standardized LCA and economic evaluation of five AOPs for tetracycline degradation, revealing key sustainability trade-offs • Catalyst production and material sourcing incur up to 90% environmental impacts. • With energy-efficient reactors and green electricity, sonolysis becomes the most sustainable and affordable option • Indirect environmental costs contribute up to 55% of total treatment expenses • Catalyst reuse and green energy can reduce emissions by 70%

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 525
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.