Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Vertebroplasty Versus Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Introduction Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are widely performed for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). The objective of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes between patients undergoing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs. Methods We used the TriNetX US Collaborative Research Platform to identify adults aged ≥50 years with osteoporotic VCFs treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty between 2000 and 2025. Patients with malignancy were excluded. Cohorts were propensity-matched 1:1 (7,528 per cohort) on demographic, comorbidity, and bone health variables. Outcomes were assessed using International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes: subsequent fractures (one year), short-term neurologic/functional complications (one month), opioid prescriptions (one year), repeat augmentation (two years), and all-cause mortality (five years). Results Patients treated with kyphoplasty had a higher one-year risk of subsequent vertebral fractures compared with vertebroplasty (4,196 (55.7%) vs 3,905 (51.9%); HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85-0.93; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing vertebroplasty experienced more short-term neurologic complications, including spinal cord compression (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.08-1.31; p < 0.001), radiculopathy (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.33; p = 0.004), and difficulty walking (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.65-2.79; p < 0.001). The two-year risk of repeat vertebral augmentation did not differ meaningfully between procedures (1,111 (14.8%) vs 1,069 (14.2%); HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90-1.10; p = 0.90). Five-year all-cause mortality was similar between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.10; p = 0.13). Conclusion Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty demonstrated comparable long-term survival and repeat procedure rates, but differed in specific risk profiles. Kyphoplasty carried a modestly higher risk of subsequent fractures, whereas vertebroplasty was associated with more short-term complications and earlier, more frequent opioid use. These findings should inform procedure selection in patients with osteoporotic VCFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96438
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Vertebroplasty Versus Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Parshva A. Sanghvi, Jonathan Belding, R. Justin Mistovich, Austin Lee et al.
Cureus
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Vertebroplasty Versus Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Parshva A. Sanghvi, Jonathan Belding, R. Justin Mistovich, Austin Lee, Nicholas G Belt
article en

Abstract

Introduction Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are widely performed for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). The objective of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes between patients undergoing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs. Methods We used the TriNetX US Collaborative Research Platform to identify adults aged ≥50 years with osteoporotic VCFs treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty between 2000 and 2025. Patients with malignancy were excluded. Cohorts were propensity-matched 1:1 (7,528 per cohort) on demographic, comorbidity, and bone health variables. Outcomes were assessed using International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes: subsequent fractures (one year), short-term neurologic/functional complications (one month), opioid prescriptions (one year), repeat augmentation (two years), and all-cause mortality (five years). Results Patients treated with kyphoplasty had a higher one-year risk of subsequent vertebral fractures compared with vertebroplasty (4,196 (55.7%) vs 3,905 (51.9%); HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85-0.93; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing vertebroplasty experienced more short-term neurologic complications, including spinal cord compression (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.08-1.31; p < 0.001), radiculopathy (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.33; p = 0.004), and difficulty walking (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.65-2.79; p < 0.001). The two-year risk of repeat vertebral augmentation did not differ meaningfully between procedures (1,111 (14.8%) vs 1,069 (14.2%); HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90-1.10; p = 0.90). Five-year all-cause mortality was similar between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.10; p = 0.13). Conclusion Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty demonstrated comparable long-term survival and repeat procedure rates, but differed in specific risk profiles. Kyphoplasty carried a modestly higher risk of subsequent fractures, whereas vertebroplasty was associated with more short-term complications and earlier, more frequent opioid use. These findings should inform procedure selection in patients with osteoporotic VCFs.

CureusVol. 17(11)
MetroHealth (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.