Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals

To address claims of human exceptionalism, we determine where humans fit within the greater mammalian distribution of reproductive inequality. We show that humans exhibit lower reproductive skew (i.e., inequality in the number of surviving offspring) among males and smaller sex differences in reproductive skew than most other mammals, while nevertheless falling within the mammalian range. Additionally, female reproductive skew is higher in polygynous human populations than in polygynous nonhumans mammals on average. This patterning of skew can be attributed in part to the prevalence of monogamy in humans compared to the predominance of polygyny in nonhuman mammals, to the limited degree of polygyny in the human societies that practice it, and to the importance of unequally held rival resources to women's fitness. The muted reproductive inequality observed in humans appears to be linked to several unusual characteristics of our species-including high levels of cooperation among males, high dependence on unequally held rival resources, complementarities between maternal and paternal investment, as well as social and legal institutions that enforce monogamous norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/4mav-9302
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals

Rita Anne McNamara, Jennifer E. Smith, David A. Nolin, Karen B. Strier et al.
UNC Libraries
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals

Rita Anne McNamara, Jennifer E. Smith, David A. Nolin, Karen B. Strier, Susan Perry, Emily E. Wroblewski, Shane A. Scaggs, Samuel S. Urlacher, Janet Headland, Bret Beheim, Kai P. Willführ, Jonathan Salerno, Russell D. Greaves, Abigail E. Page, Kathryn S. Oths, Brian M. Wood, Eleanor A. Power, Thomas N. Headland, Ruizhe Liu, Rebecca Sear, Dimitris Xygalatas, Adam H. Boyette, Christopher von Rueden, Cristina Moya, Fatema Tuz Zohora, Mary K. Shenk, Claudia Valeggia, Roberto Lizarralde, Edmond Seabright, Angelina L. DeMarco, Ryan Schacht, Bapu Vaitla, Mark Dyble, Adrian V. Jaeggi, Michael Gurven, Kara K. Walker, Seung-Yun Oh, Heidi Colleran, Emma Cohen, Jamsranjav Bayarsaikhan, Daniel Nettle, Gianluca Grimalda, Siobhán M. Mattison, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Bruce Winterhalder, Chelsea Carminito, Claire El Mouden, Mary C. Towner, Joseph Lanning, Quentin D. Atkinson, Samuli Helle, Barry S. Hewlett, Luís Pacheco-Cobos, Nurul Alam, Karen L. Kramer, Brooke A. Scelza, Cody T. Ross, Eckart Voland, Sheina Lew‐Levy, Sergey Gavrilets, Eric Alden Smith, Jenni E. Pettay, Caissa Revilla‐Minaya, Richard McElreath, Christopher D. Golden, Hillard S Kaplan, Shane J. Macfarlan, Sean S. Downey, Daniel Redhead, Lawrence S. Sugiyama, Anne C. Pisor, Samuel Bowles, Aiyana K. Willard, Coren L. Apicella, Helen Davis, Anne E. Pusey, Mhairi A. Gibson, Julia Clark, Karl Mertens, Felicia C. Madimenos, Frank W. Marlowe, John P. Ziker, Virpi Lummaa, John Andrew Bunce, Stephen Beckerman, Tami Blumenfield, Kathrine Starkweather, Andrea Bamberg Migliano, Irene Godoy, Eric Massengill, Patricia Draper, Carmen Cortez, Gregory Clark, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Mark A. Caudell, Paul W. Leslie, Chun‐Yi Sum, Paul L. Hooper, Stefani A. Crabtree, Kim Hill, Jeremy Koster, Melissa A. Liebert, Daniel Major‐Smith, A. Magdalena Hurtado
article en

Abstract

To address claims of human exceptionalism, we determine where humans fit within the greater mammalian distribution of reproductive inequality. We show that humans exhibit lower reproductive skew (i.e., inequality in the number of surviving offspring) among males and smaller sex differences in reproductive skew than most other mammals, while nevertheless falling within the mammalian range. Additionally, female reproductive skew is higher in polygynous human populations than in polygynous nonhumans mammals on average. This patterning of skew can be attributed in part to the prevalence of monogamy in humans compared to the predominance of polygyny in nonhuman mammals, to the limited degree of polygyny in the human societies that practice it, and to the importance of unequally held rival resources to women's fitness. The muted reproductive inequality observed in humans appears to be linked to several unusual characteristics of our species-including high levels of cooperation among males, high dependence on unequally held rival resources, complementarities between maternal and paternal investment, as well as social and legal institutions that enforce monogamous norms.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.