Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions

We studied the effects of exposure to reshared content on Facebook during the 2020 US election by assigning a random set of consenting, US-based users to feeds that did not contain any reshares over a 3-month period. We find that removing reshared content substantially decreases the amount of political news, including content from untrustworthy sources, to which users are exposed; decreases overall clicks and reactions; and reduces partisan news clicks. Further, we observe that removing reshared content produces clear decreases in news knowledge within the sample, although there is some uncertainty about how this would generalize to all users. Contrary to expectations, the treatment does not significantly affect political polarization or any measure of individual-level political attitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/e1dj-y987
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions

Rebekah Tromble, Matthew Gentzkow, Annie Franco, Pablo Barberá et al.
UNC Libraries
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions

Rebekah Tromble, Matthew Gentzkow, Annie Franco, Pablo Barberá, Brendan Nyhan, David Lazer, Taylor Brown, Devra Moehler, Emily Thorson, Adriana Crespo-Tenorio, Jaime E. Settle, Neil Malhotra, Daniel Robert Thomas, Arjun Wilkins, Chad Kiewiet de Jonge, Young Mie Kim, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Andrew M. Guess, Edward H. Kennedy, Drew Dimmery, Sandra González‐Bailón, Natalie Jomini Stroud, Hunt Allcott, Joshua A. Tucker, Carlos Velasco Rivera, Deen Freelon, Jennifer Pan, Winter Mason, B.S. Xiong
article en

Abstract

We studied the effects of exposure to reshared content on Facebook during the 2020 US election by assigning a random set of consenting, US-based users to feeds that did not contain any reshares over a 3-month period. We find that removing reshared content substantially decreases the amount of political news, including content from untrustworthy sources, to which users are exposed; decreases overall clicks and reactions; and reduces partisan news clicks. Further, we observe that removing reshared content produces clear decreases in news knowledge within the sample, although there is some uncertainty about how this would generalize to all users. Contrary to expectations, the treatment does not significantly affect political polarization or any measure of individual-level political attitudes.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of North Carolina
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.