Hard Then, Harder Now: CoCom’s Lessons and the Challenge of Crafting Effective Export Controls Against China

Abstract: Will the US-led technology control regime against China have a meaningful impact on the emerging great power competition? Supporters praise the effort’s targeted approach and optimistically see the case as a prime example of weaponized interdependence. But we identify three lessons from the Cold War “CoCom” technology control regime that show the problems and costs associated with the current US effort, particularly over the long haul: (1) The size of the export control regime expands over time, weakening enforcement and encouraging defection. (2) CoCom did not prevent the USSR from accessing key technologies. The current regime is similarly porous, and China is a more adept target. (3) CoCom had more favorable conditions for partner cooperation, yet was rife with tensions and jealousies that disrupted US alliances. Partner conflicts are likely to recur as controls expand and enforcement weakens. These findings have important implications for US economic security policy, US alliances, and arguments about weaponized interdependence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas National Security Review
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tns.00010
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard Then, Harder Now: CoCom’s Lessons and the Challenge of Crafting Effective Export Controls Against China

Jennifer Lind, Michael Mastanduno
Texas National Security Review
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Hard Then, Harder Now: CoCom’s Lessons and the Challenge of Crafting Effective Export Controls Against China

Jennifer Lind, Michael Mastanduno
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Will the US-led technology control regime against China have a meaningful impact on the emerging great power competition? Supporters praise the effort’s targeted approach and optimistically see the case as a prime example of weaponized interdependence. But we identify three lessons from the Cold War “CoCom” technology control regime that show the problems and costs associated with the current US effort, particularly over the long haul: (1) The size of the export control regime expands over time, weakening enforcement and encouraging defection. (2) CoCom did not prevent the USSR from accessing key technologies. The current regime is similarly porous, and China is a more adept target. (3) CoCom had more favorable conditions for partner cooperation, yet was rife with tensions and jealousies that disrupted US alliances. Partner conflicts are likely to recur as controls expand and enforcement weakens. These findings have important implications for US economic security policy, US alliances, and arguments about weaponized interdependence.

Texas National Security ReviewVol. 8(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hard Then, Harder Now: CoCom’s Lessons and the Challenge of Crafting Effective Export Controls Against China — Jennifer Lind, Michael Mastanduno · Texas National Security Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS