Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Density Thresholds for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Equivocal prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 3) remain a diagnostic challenge. The use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has been suggested to help risk-stratify this cohort of patients to help guide the decision to biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSAD across multiple cut-offs in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Methods A retrospective audit of 194 men with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) who underwent prostate biopsy was performed. Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, and PSAD were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess model accuracy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify significant predictors of csPCa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at PSAD thresholds of 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>. Results csPCa was identified in 47 (24.2%) of patients. Median prostate volume was significantly lower, and PSAD was considerably higher, in this cohort of patients (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.79). Multivariate analysis confirmed that PSAD remained a significant predictor for csPCa (odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity at PSAD ≥ 0.10 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>, ≥ 0.15 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>, and ≥0.20 ng/mL<sup>2</sup> were 0.92/0.29, 0.68/0.65, and 0.53/0.84, respectively. PPV increased (0.29, 0.39, and 0.52) while NPV remained high (0.91,0.87,0.85) across these cut-offs. Conclusion PSAD is demonstrated as a good predictor for csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions. A threshold of 0.15 ng/mL<sup>2</sup> provides a good balance between sensitivity and specificity and supports its use in determining biopsy decisions in this cohort. Validation in larger multicentre cohorts is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96432
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Density Thresholds for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Megan Scobie, Anurag Agarwal, Vignesh Balasubaramaniam, M. Thangavelu et al.
Cureus
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Density Thresholds for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Megan Scobie, Anurag Agarwal, Vignesh Balasubaramaniam, M. Thangavelu, Kliment Donev, A Kailasa, Shanmugasigamani Kannan, Kyriacos Alexandrou, Muhammad Nazir
article en

Abstract

Introduction Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Equivocal prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 3) remain a diagnostic challenge. The use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has been suggested to help risk-stratify this cohort of patients to help guide the decision to biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSAD across multiple cut-offs in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Methods A retrospective audit of 194 men with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) who underwent prostate biopsy was performed. Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, and PSAD were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess model accuracy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify significant predictors of csPCa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated at PSAD thresholds of 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>. Results csPCa was identified in 47 (24.2%) of patients. Median prostate volume was significantly lower, and PSAD was considerably higher, in this cohort of patients (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.79). Multivariate analysis confirmed that PSAD remained a significant predictor for csPCa (odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity at PSAD ≥ 0.10 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>, ≥ 0.15 ng/mL<sup>2</sup>, and ≥0.20 ng/mL<sup>2</sup> were 0.92/0.29, 0.68/0.65, and 0.53/0.84, respectively. PPV increased (0.29, 0.39, and 0.52) while NPV remained high (0.91,0.87,0.85) across these cut-offs. Conclusion PSAD is demonstrated as a good predictor for csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions. A threshold of 0.15 ng/mL<sup>2</sup> provides a good balance between sensitivity and specificity and supports its use in determining biopsy decisions in this cohort. Validation in larger multicentre cohorts is warranted.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), Wrexham Maelor Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.