Bridging the gender gap in trust governance, legal reform, and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh’s Trusts Act 1882

Abstract Section 60 Explanation 1 of the Trusts Act 1882 in Bangladesh disqualifies married women from acting as trustees unless permitted by the beneficiary’s personal law, a provision rooted in colonial-era patriarchal norms. This article assesses the historical rationale, legal implications, and alignment of this restriction with Bangladesh’s constitutional guarantees and international human rights obligations, especially in relation to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Through an extensive comparative analysis, it examines trustee eligibility frameworks, highlighting lessons for reform. Addressing key research questions, the study identifies gaps in empirical and comparative research and proposes legislative, judicial, and societal reforms to align the Trusts Act 1882 with contemporary gender equity standards. The analysis underscores the urgent need to repeal this anachronistic restriction to empower women in fiduciary roles and advance Bangladesh’s commitment to equality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trusts & Trustees
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaf086
Primary Topic
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gender gap in trust governance, legal reform, and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh’s Trusts Act 1882

Mohammed Shahjalal
Trusts & Trustees
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
article

Bridging the gender gap in trust governance, legal reform, and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh’s Trusts Act 1882

Mohammed Shahjalal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Section 60 Explanation 1 of the Trusts Act 1882 in Bangladesh disqualifies married women from acting as trustees unless permitted by the beneficiary’s personal law, a provision rooted in colonial-era patriarchal norms. This article assesses the historical rationale, legal implications, and alignment of this restriction with Bangladesh’s constitutional guarantees and international human rights obligations, especially in relation to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Through an extensive comparative analysis, it examines trustee eligibility frameworks, highlighting lessons for reform. Addressing key research questions, the study identifies gaps in empirical and comparative research and proposes legislative, judicial, and societal reforms to align the Trusts Act 1882 with contemporary gender equity standards. The analysis underscores the urgent need to repeal this anachronistic restriction to empower women in fiduciary roles and advance Bangladesh’s commitment to equality.

Trusts & TrusteesVol. 32(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the gender gap in trust governance, legal reform, and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh’s Trusts Act 1882 — Mohammed Shahjalal · Trusts & Trustees (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS