Beyond social equity: Talking social justice in public administration

Social equity scholarship has had a prominent place in public administration and in the pages of Public Administration Review (PAR) since 1974 when George Frederickson edited a PAR symposium on social equity. More recently, PAR has published landmark articles on social equity (e.g., Frederickson, 1990; Gooden, 2015; Guy & McCandless, 2012; Pandey, Newcomer, et al., 2022; Wright & Merritt, 2020), as well as editorials calling for richer and more inclusive conceptualizations of the concept. For example, PAR editorials have identified the need to better theorize race, gender, class, and geography, and examine disciplinary blind spots (Battaglio & Hall, 2018; Hall, 2022, 2022b; Pandey, Bearfield, & Hall, 2022; Pandey, Cheng, & Hall, 2022).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/079t-m922
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond social equity: Talking social justice in public administration

Eiko Strader, Kathryn E. Newcomer, Jeremy L. Hall, James E. Wright et al.
UNC Libraries
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Beyond social equity: Talking social justice in public administration

Eiko Strader, Kathryn E. Newcomer, Jeremy L. Hall, James E. Wright, Sanjay K. Pandey, Camilla Stivers, Leisha DeHart‐Davis, Meghna Sabharwal, Shannon Portillo
article en

Abstract

Social equity scholarship has had a prominent place in public administration and in the pages of Public Administration Review (PAR) since 1974 when George Frederickson edited a PAR symposium on social equity. More recently, PAR has published landmark articles on social equity (e.g., Frederickson, 1990; Gooden, 2015; Guy & McCandless, 2012; Pandey, Newcomer, et al., 2022; Wright & Merritt, 2020), as well as editorials calling for richer and more inclusive conceptualizations of the concept. For example, PAR editorials have identified the need to better theorize race, gender, class, and geography, and examine disciplinary blind spots (Battaglio & Hall, 2018; Hall, 2022, 2022b; Pandey, Bearfield, & Hall, 2022; Pandey, Cheng, & Hall, 2022).

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.