Racial disparities in Clostridioides difficile testing in three southeastern US hospitals

OBJECTIVE: To analyze <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> testing in 3 hospitals in central North Carolina to validate previous racial health-disparity findings. METHODS: We completed a retrospective analysis of inpatient <em>C. difficile</em> tests from 2015 to 2021 at 3 university-affiliated hospitals in North Carolina. We calculated the number of <em>C. difficile</em> tests per 1,000 patient days stratified by race: White, Black, and non-White, non-Black (NWNB). We defined a unique <em>C. difficile</em> test as one that occurred in an inpatient unit with a matching laboratory accession ID and on differing calendar days. Tests were evaluated overall, by hospital, by year, and by positivity rate. RESULTS: In total, 35,160 <em>C. difficile</em> tests and 2,571,850 patient days across all 3 hospitals from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. The median number of <em>C. difficile</em> tests per 1,000 patient days was 13.85 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.88-16.07). Among all <em>C. difficile</em> tests, 5,225 (15%) were positive. White patients were administered more <em>C. difficile</em> tests (14.46 per 1,000 patient days) than Black patients (12.96; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) or NWNB race patients (10.27; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Black patients were administered more tests than NWNB patients (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). White patients tested positive at a similar rate to Black patients (15% vs 15%; <em>P</em> = .3655) and higher than NWNB individuals (12%; <em>P</em> = .0061), and Black patients tested positive at a higher rate than NWNB patients (<em>P</em> = .0024). CONCLUSION: White patients received more <em>C. difficile</em> tests than Black and NWNB patient groups when controlling for race patient days. Future studies should control for comorbidities and investigate community onset of <em>C. difficile</em> by race and ethnicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/c68d-1814
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial disparities in Clostridioides difficile testing in three southeastern US hospitals

Deverick J. Anderson, Amanda Graves, Aaron Barrett, Bobby Warren et al.
UNC Libraries
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

Racial disparities in Clostridioides difficile testing in three southeastern US hospitals

Deverick J. Anderson, Amanda Graves, Aaron Barrett, Bobby Warren, Erin Gettler, Rebekah W. Moehring, Nicholas Turner, Christopher D. Burch
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> testing in 3 hospitals in central North Carolina to validate previous racial health-disparity findings. METHODS: We completed a retrospective analysis of inpatient <em>C. difficile</em> tests from 2015 to 2021 at 3 university-affiliated hospitals in North Carolina. We calculated the number of <em>C. difficile</em> tests per 1,000 patient days stratified by race: White, Black, and non-White, non-Black (NWNB). We defined a unique <em>C. difficile</em> test as one that occurred in an inpatient unit with a matching laboratory accession ID and on differing calendar days. Tests were evaluated overall, by hospital, by year, and by positivity rate. RESULTS: In total, 35,160 <em>C. difficile</em> tests and 2,571,850 patient days across all 3 hospitals from 2015 to 2021 were analyzed. The median number of <em>C. difficile</em> tests per 1,000 patient days was 13.85 (interquartile range [IQR], 9.88-16.07). Among all <em>C. difficile</em> tests, 5,225 (15%) were positive. White patients were administered more <em>C. difficile</em> tests (14.46 per 1,000 patient days) than Black patients (12.96; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) or NWNB race patients (10.27; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Black patients were administered more tests than NWNB patients (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). White patients tested positive at a similar rate to Black patients (15% vs 15%; <em>P</em> = .3655) and higher than NWNB individuals (12%; <em>P</em> = .0061), and Black patients tested positive at a higher rate than NWNB patients (<em>P</em> = .0024). CONCLUSION: White patients received more <em>C. difficile</em> tests than Black and NWNB patient groups when controlling for race patient days. Future studies should control for comorbidities and investigate community onset of <em>C. difficile</em> by race and ethnicity.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.