Sleep restriction increases reward sensitivity during sequential updating

Chronic sleep restriction is a common phenomenon in the real world, yet its impact on how individuals learn and adapt to dynamic patterns of reward in uncertain environments are not well understood. The present study examined how sleep restriction alters the cognitive mechanisms underlying sequential updating, defined as the process by which individuals revise beliefs over time in response to outcome feedback. Thirty-six healthy adults completed two conditions in counterbalanced order: well-rested (seven nights of 9 h time-in-bed) and sleep restriction (seven nights of 5 h time-in-bed). On the final day of each condition, participants performed a probabilistic reversal learning task, requiring flexible behavioral adjustments in response to changing reward contingencies. Computational models grounded in reinforcement learning and Bayesian frameworks were fitted to trial-level data using hierarchical Bayesian estimation. Our model comparison indicated the Asymmetric Rescorla-Wagner model best accounted for behavior, indicating feedback-driven updating with distinct learning rates for reward and nonreward outcomes on the probabilistic reversal learning task. Importantly, sleep restriction increased sensitivity to reward feedback and choice stochasticity, indicating greater reward-chasing behavior and less goal-directed decision making under sleep restriction. Trial accuracy did not differ between conditions. These findings diverge from previous evidence indicating reduced sensitivity toward negative outcomes following short-term sleep restriction, pointing to possible dose-dependent sleep restriction effects and those arising from differences in task requirements. Our findings may have practical implications for decision quality in real-world domains where performance depends on optimal feedback-based updating under uncertain decision environments. Statement of Significance While sleep loss is known to affect decision making, little is understood about how it impacts people's ability to learn from experience over time. In many real-world situations, like financial trading and medical contexts, optimized decisions rely on updating beliefs and strategies based on incoming feedback. In this study, we show after one week of sleep restriction, individuals became more influenced by rewards and demonstrated increased choice randomness. This suggests they were more likely to chase immediate gains but had difficulty sustaining consistent decision strategies. These findings help explain how sleep restriction can undermine learning and flexible decision making when faced with uncertainty, and carry implications for performance and accountability in roles where repeated, high-stakes decisions are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf354
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sleep restriction increases reward sensitivity during sequential updating

Daniel Bennett, Sean P. A. Drummond, Jeryl Y L Lim
SLEEP
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

Sleep restriction increases reward sensitivity during sequential updating

Daniel Bennett, Sean P. A. Drummond, Jeryl Y L Lim
article en

Abstract

Chronic sleep restriction is a common phenomenon in the real world, yet its impact on how individuals learn and adapt to dynamic patterns of reward in uncertain environments are not well understood. The present study examined how sleep restriction alters the cognitive mechanisms underlying sequential updating, defined as the process by which individuals revise beliefs over time in response to outcome feedback. Thirty-six healthy adults completed two conditions in counterbalanced order: well-rested (seven nights of 9 h time-in-bed) and sleep restriction (seven nights of 5 h time-in-bed). On the final day of each condition, participants performed a probabilistic reversal learning task, requiring flexible behavioral adjustments in response to changing reward contingencies. Computational models grounded in reinforcement learning and Bayesian frameworks were fitted to trial-level data using hierarchical Bayesian estimation. Our model comparison indicated the Asymmetric Rescorla-Wagner model best accounted for behavior, indicating feedback-driven updating with distinct learning rates for reward and nonreward outcomes on the probabilistic reversal learning task. Importantly, sleep restriction increased sensitivity to reward feedback and choice stochasticity, indicating greater reward-chasing behavior and less goal-directed decision making under sleep restriction. Trial accuracy did not differ between conditions. These findings diverge from previous evidence indicating reduced sensitivity toward negative outcomes following short-term sleep restriction, pointing to possible dose-dependent sleep restriction effects and those arising from differences in task requirements. Our findings may have practical implications for decision quality in real-world domains where performance depends on optimal feedback-based updating under uncertain decision environments. Statement of Significance While sleep loss is known to affect decision making, little is understood about how it impacts people's ability to learn from experience over time. In many real-world situations, like financial trading and medical contexts, optimized decisions rely on updating beliefs and strategies based on incoming feedback. In this study, we show after one week of sleep restriction, individuals became more influenced by rewards and demonstrated increased choice randomness. This suggests they were more likely to chase immediate gains but had difficulty sustaining consistent decision strategies. These findings help explain how sleep restriction can undermine learning and flexible decision making when faced with uncertainty, and carry implications for performance and accountability in roles where repeated, high-stakes decisions are required.

SLEEPVol. 49(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Monash University (AU), Australian Psychological Society (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.