Lightweight composite optimization of URAL-4320 chassis using CFRP and BFRP: Structural and modal finite element analysis

• Finite element–based lightweight optimization of URAL-4320 truck chassis using CFRP and BFRP composites. • Inclusion of anisotropic composite layup modeling and validated mesh convergence study. • Comparative structural and modal analysis demonstrating material performance differences. • CFRP achieved higher stiffness and natural frequencies; BFRP offered superior damping and impact energy absorption. • Results provide design insights for lightweight, durable military and heavy-duty vehicle chassis systems. The chassis frame is a vehicle’s primary structural backbone and its material selection critically affects mass, dynamic performance and durability. This work evaluates lightweighting strategies for the URAL-4320 ladder-frame chassis by replacing HSLA steel with advanced composites — Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) — and performing structural and modal finite element analyses in ANSYS R19.2 on CAD models created in SolidWorks 2020. Static analyses compared von Mises stress, shear stress, strain energy and total deformation across load cases representative of payload and drivetrain loads. Modal and harmonic analyses identified natural frequencies, mode shapes and the chassis’ dynamic response. A mesh convergence study and an orthotropic composite layup modelling procedure are documented to ensure numerical robustness and realistic anisotropic behaviour. Results indicate that CFRP provides markedly higher stiffness, lower deformations and higher natural frequencies, favoring precision and vibration resistance; BFRP yields higher strain energy and modal deformation, indicating improved impact energy absorption and damping potential but lower stiffness. We discuss tradeoffs in cost, manufacturability, and survivability, and provide design recommendations for application-specific selection between CFRP and BFRP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108134
Primary Topic
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lightweight composite optimization of URAL-4320 chassis using CFRP and BFRP: Structural and modal finite element analysis

Elias Wakshume
Results in Engineering
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
article

Lightweight composite optimization of URAL-4320 chassis using CFRP and BFRP: Structural and modal finite element analysis

Elias Wakshume
article en

Abstract

• Finite element–based lightweight optimization of URAL-4320 truck chassis using CFRP and BFRP composites. • Inclusion of anisotropic composite layup modeling and validated mesh convergence study. • Comparative structural and modal analysis demonstrating material performance differences. • CFRP achieved higher stiffness and natural frequencies; BFRP offered superior damping and impact energy absorption. • Results provide design insights for lightweight, durable military and heavy-duty vehicle chassis systems. The chassis frame is a vehicle’s primary structural backbone and its material selection critically affects mass, dynamic performance and durability. This work evaluates lightweighting strategies for the URAL-4320 ladder-frame chassis by replacing HSLA steel with advanced composites — Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) — and performing structural and modal finite element analyses in ANSYS R19.2 on CAD models created in SolidWorks 2020. Static analyses compared von Mises stress, shear stress, strain energy and total deformation across load cases representative of payload and drivetrain loads. Modal and harmonic analyses identified natural frequencies, mode shapes and the chassis’ dynamic response. A mesh convergence study and an orthotropic composite layup modelling procedure are documented to ensure numerical robustness and realistic anisotropic behaviour. Results indicate that CFRP provides markedly higher stiffness, lower deformations and higher natural frequencies, favoring precision and vibration resistance; BFRP yields higher strain energy and modal deformation, indicating improved impact energy absorption and damping potential but lower stiffness. We discuss tradeoffs in cost, manufacturability, and survivability, and provide design recommendations for application-specific selection between CFRP and BFRP.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Ethiopian Defence University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.