Comparative evaluation of COP and phase change impacts in reversed rankine and brayton cycles for high-temperature heat pump systems

• Case study shows Rankine COP 3.48 at sink 150–200 °C and source 120–110 °C with ∼72 % from phase change. • Under the same bounds Brayton achieves COP 1.84 with sensible heat only. • The reversed Rankine is superior while the sink is below about 310 °C along with higher exergy efficiency. • Above about 310 °C the latent advantage disappears, and Brayton becomes competitive with higher exergy efficiency. • Reversed Rankine cycle outperforms when latent heat contribution exceeds 50% of total COP. The growing demand for industrial heat has sparked fresh interest in high-temperature heat pumps (HTHPs) because they can offer a low-cost method to upgrade low temperature waste heat. In this study, two conventional heat pump cycles, a reversed Rankine cycle utilising water and a reversed Brayton cycle employing air as the working fluid are compared. The analysis specifically examines the impact of phase change within the Rankine cycle on overall performance of the heat pump by breaking down the coefficient of performance (COP) into sensible and latent heat contributions. It was seen that when the heat sink temperature increased from 150 °C to 200 °C and the heat source temperature decreased from 120 °C to 110 °C, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the reversed Rankine cycle reached 3.48, with 72.13 % contribution from phase-change heat and 27.87 % from sensible heat. In contrast, the reversed Brayton cycle achieved a COP of 1.84, entirely governed by sensible heat transfer. It was observed that at lower heat sink temperatures (below approximately 310 °C), the reversed Rankine cycle clearly benefits from the latent heat associated with water phase change, leading to significantly improved COP and less exergy destruction compared to the Brayton cycle. However, most of the latent heat advantage of reversed Rankine cycle disappears as the heat sink temperature approaches the critical point of water at the given pressure and the reversed Brayton cycle becomes more competitive. Collectively, the findings provide practical guidelines for selecting suitable HTHP systems based on the target operating temperature and the feasibility of employing water or air as working fluids in real world industrial applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101393
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of COP and phase change impacts in reversed rankine and brayton cycles for high-temperature heat pump systems

Maziar Arjomandi, Eric Jing Hu, A. S. Nejad, Bo Yang
Energy Conversion and Management X
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Comparative evaluation of COP and phase change impacts in reversed rankine and brayton cycles for high-temperature heat pump systems

Maziar Arjomandi, Eric Jing Hu, A. S. Nejad, Bo Yang
article en

Abstract

• Case study shows Rankine COP 3.48 at sink 150–200 °C and source 120–110 °C with ∼72 % from phase change. • Under the same bounds Brayton achieves COP 1.84 with sensible heat only. • The reversed Rankine is superior while the sink is below about 310 °C along with higher exergy efficiency. • Above about 310 °C the latent advantage disappears, and Brayton becomes competitive with higher exergy efficiency. • Reversed Rankine cycle outperforms when latent heat contribution exceeds 50% of total COP. The growing demand for industrial heat has sparked fresh interest in high-temperature heat pumps (HTHPs) because they can offer a low-cost method to upgrade low temperature waste heat. In this study, two conventional heat pump cycles, a reversed Rankine cycle utilising water and a reversed Brayton cycle employing air as the working fluid are compared. The analysis specifically examines the impact of phase change within the Rankine cycle on overall performance of the heat pump by breaking down the coefficient of performance (COP) into sensible and latent heat contributions. It was seen that when the heat sink temperature increased from 150 °C to 200 °C and the heat source temperature decreased from 120 °C to 110 °C, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the reversed Rankine cycle reached 3.48, with 72.13 % contribution from phase-change heat and 27.87 % from sensible heat. In contrast, the reversed Brayton cycle achieved a COP of 1.84, entirely governed by sensible heat transfer. It was observed that at lower heat sink temperatures (below approximately 310 °C), the reversed Rankine cycle clearly benefits from the latent heat associated with water phase change, leading to significantly improved COP and less exergy destruction compared to the Brayton cycle. However, most of the latent heat advantage of reversed Rankine cycle disappears as the heat sink temperature approaches the critical point of water at the given pressure and the reversed Brayton cycle becomes more competitive. Collectively, the findings provide practical guidelines for selecting suitable HTHP systems based on the target operating temperature and the feasibility of employing water or air as working fluids in real world industrial applications.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 28
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.