High-fidelity data-driven multi-objective design of class F fly ash–geopolymer concrete

Class F fly-ash geopolymers (FA-GPCs) can slash the CO₂ burden of structural concrete, yet their mix design still relies on costly trial-and-error. The first geometry-normalized database of FA-only geopolymer concretes was assembled—799 mixes from 67 publications, every reported strength converted to the 150 Ø 300 mm cylinder equivalent—and interrogate it with a three-scenario, data-availability workflow. Eighteen machine-, deep- and hybrid-learning models are benchmarked; a Voting ensemble predicts 7–28 days compressive strength with an R 2 of 0.962, while an LSTM + XGBoost hybrid forecasts mix-specific CO₂ footprints at an R 2 of 0.996. SHAP analysis reveals that the Si/Al ratio and initial curing temperature dominate early-age strength, whereas total Na₂SiO₃/NaOH and Na₂O/binder ratios control embodied carbon, underscoring an inherent strength–footprint trade-off. These surrogate models feed a multi-objective optimizer (NSGA-II, confirmed superior to NSGA-III and MOEA/D) that explores the 1st–99th-percentile bounds of 11 mix variables. The resulting Pareto fronts deliver eco-efficient recipes reaching 65 MPa at ≤30 kg CO₂/m 3 (at 90-d curing age) and extend to 87 MPa under relaxed carbon targets. Compared with state-of-the-art optimization that rely on mixed precursors or un-normalized data, the proposed pipeline widens the design space, lifts strength by 10–20 MPa and trims CO₂ by up to 70 %. The framework— in this order: data curation, geometry correction, scenario-specific ML, evolutionary optimization—cuts trial batching efforts and offers practitioners ready-to-deploy, class F FA-GPC mixtures while providing a transparent template for other alkali-activated binders which was confirmed by an experimental validation. • Geometry-normalized database of ~800 FA-geopolymer mixes enables apples-to-apples ML. • Voting ensemble predicts 7–28-d strength at R 2 = 0.962; LSTM + XGBoost CO₂ at R 2 = 0.996. • SHAP shows Si/Al ratio and curing-T drive strength, while Na-metrics govern CO₂ footprint. • NSGA-II yields Pareto mixes hitting 65 MPa at ≤30 kg CO₂/m 3 (90-d curing). • Framework cuts trial batches and offers ready-to-use class F FA-GPC recipes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121900
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-fidelity data-driven multi-objective design of class F fly ash–geopolymer concrete

Mostafa Aliyari, Shima Pilehvar, Mahdi Kioumarsi, Moncef L. Nehdi et al.
1 citations
Powder Technology
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
article

High-fidelity data-driven multi-objective design of class F fly ash–geopolymer concrete

Mostafa Aliyari, Shima Pilehvar, Mahdi Kioumarsi, Moncef L. Nehdi, Amine el Mahdi Safhi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Class F fly-ash geopolymers (FA-GPCs) can slash the CO₂ burden of structural concrete, yet their mix design still relies on costly trial-and-error. The first geometry-normalized database of FA-only geopolymer concretes was assembled—799 mixes from 67 publications, every reported strength converted to the 150 Ø 300 mm cylinder equivalent—and interrogate it with a three-scenario, data-availability workflow. Eighteen machine-, deep- and hybrid-learning models are benchmarked; a Voting ensemble predicts 7–28 days compressive strength with an R 2 of 0.962, while an LSTM + XGBoost hybrid forecasts mix-specific CO₂ footprints at an R 2 of 0.996. SHAP analysis reveals that the Si/Al ratio and initial curing temperature dominate early-age strength, whereas total Na₂SiO₃/NaOH and Na₂O/binder ratios control embodied carbon, underscoring an inherent strength–footprint trade-off. These surrogate models feed a multi-objective optimizer (NSGA-II, confirmed superior to NSGA-III and MOEA/D) that explores the 1st–99th-percentile bounds of 11 mix variables. The resulting Pareto fronts deliver eco-efficient recipes reaching 65 MPa at ≤30 kg CO₂/m 3 (at 90-d curing age) and extend to 87 MPa under relaxed carbon targets. Compared with state-of-the-art optimization that rely on mixed precursors or un-normalized data, the proposed pipeline widens the design space, lifts strength by 10–20 MPa and trims CO₂ by up to 70 %. The framework— in this order: data curation, geometry correction, scenario-specific ML, evolutionary optimization—cuts trial batching efforts and offers practitioners ready-to-deploy, class F FA-GPC mixtures while providing a transparent template for other alkali-activated binders which was confirmed by an experimental validation. • Geometry-normalized database of ~800 FA-geopolymer mixes enables apples-to-apples ML. • Voting ensemble predicts 7–28-d strength at R 2 = 0.962; LSTM + XGBoost CO₂ at R 2 = 0.996. • SHAP shows Si/Al ratio and curing-T drive strength, while Na-metrics govern CO₂ footprint. • NSGA-II yields Pareto mixes hitting 65 MPa at ≤30 kg CO₂/m 3 (90-d curing). • Framework cuts trial batches and offers ready-to-use class F FA-GPC recipes.

Powder TechnologyVol. 469
Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Universidad Metropolitana (PR), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.