Analyzing sustainability behavior of building materials using system dynamics and decision-making techniques

The construction industry is a major contributor to environmental degradation, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption. To address these challenges, this research develops a comprehensive framework for selecting sustainable building materials that minimize environmental impact and support climate change mitigation. The proposed methodology is structured into three key stages: (1) identification of sustainability criteria, (2) simulation of sustainability behavior, and (3) selection of sustainable strategies. In the first stage, 27 sustainability parameters were identified through a systematic review of literature and rating systems. These parameters were evaluated using a structured questionnaire distributed to 70 construction experts, applying a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and factor loading, were used to assess reliability and validity, resulting in the elimination of 11 parameters and the result of 16 key criteria. The second stage involves developing a System Dynamics (SD) model to simulate the performance of building material alternatives against selected sustainability criteria. The model evaluates materials based on five key criteria: carbon emissions, energy savings, material cost, resource-use efficiency, and waste reduction. These criteria align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 9 and SDG 12. In the final stage, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are integrated to prioritize and select the most suitable sustainable material strategy. The study evaluates five alternative material scenarios in comparison to a base case. As part of this process, a sustainability guide is developed, outlining the sustainability scores associated with each material alternative. Among the five scenarios, Scenario 3 emerges as the most sustainable option. This scenario comprises the use of reused steel, rapidly renewable wood, prefabricated gypsum board, and cast-in-place concrete. This combination achieves the highest overall sustainability score, demonstrating strong potential for supporting climate-conscious construction practices. The framework is validated through a case study of a healthcare facility in Suez, Egypt, demonstrating its applicability for real-world decision-making in sustainable construction practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05545
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing sustainability behavior of building materials using system dynamics and decision-making techniques

Mohamed Mahdy Marzouk, Shimaa Azab, Omnia Osama
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Analyzing sustainability behavior of building materials using system dynamics and decision-making techniques

Mohamed Mahdy Marzouk, Shimaa Azab, Omnia Osama
article en

Abstract

The construction industry is a major contributor to environmental degradation, primarily through greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption. To address these challenges, this research develops a comprehensive framework for selecting sustainable building materials that minimize environmental impact and support climate change mitigation. The proposed methodology is structured into three key stages: (1) identification of sustainability criteria, (2) simulation of sustainability behavior, and (3) selection of sustainable strategies. In the first stage, 27 sustainability parameters were identified through a systematic review of literature and rating systems. These parameters were evaluated using a structured questionnaire distributed to 70 construction experts, applying a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and factor loading, were used to assess reliability and validity, resulting in the elimination of 11 parameters and the result of 16 key criteria. The second stage involves developing a System Dynamics (SD) model to simulate the performance of building material alternatives against selected sustainability criteria. The model evaluates materials based on five key criteria: carbon emissions, energy savings, material cost, resource-use efficiency, and waste reduction. These criteria align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 9 and SDG 12. In the final stage, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are integrated to prioritize and select the most suitable sustainable material strategy. The study evaluates five alternative material scenarios in comparison to a base case. As part of this process, a sustainability guide is developed, outlining the sustainability scores associated with each material alternative. Among the five scenarios, Scenario 3 emerges as the most sustainable option. This scenario comprises the use of reused steel, rapidly renewable wood, prefabricated gypsum board, and cast-in-place concrete. This combination achieves the highest overall sustainability score, demonstrating strong potential for supporting climate-conscious construction practices. The framework is validated through a case study of a healthcare facility in Suez, Egypt, demonstrating its applicability for real-world decision-making in sustainable construction practices.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 23
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.