Peer-Assisted Learning Improves Confidence and Educational Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomised Control Trial

Abstract The positive impact Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) and Near-Peer-Assisted Learning (NPAL) programmes have on student engagement, progression, and retention is supported by a wealth of previous studies and is reflected in the widespread adoption of (N)PAL programmes across higher education institutions. However, controlled investigations of the efficacy of (N)PAL programmes using quantifiable outcomes are limited. In this study, a within-participant randomised control trial was used to assess weekly learning and student confidence. Across four weeks, all participants attended (in counterbalanced order) an introductory (pre-lecture) NPAL session, a review (post-lecture) NPAL session, both introductory and review sessions, or a no-session control. Our data indicate that student attendance at the introductory NPAL session had a positive effect on their weekly test score ( p = .027) , response speed ( p = .050) and self-reported confidence score ( p = .006) in the same week that the session was delivered, whereas there was no detectable effect of attending the review NPAL session. These findings provide experimental evidence for a measurable, beneficial effect of NPAL programmes on student confidence and educational outcomes, suggesting a simple intervention can have positive impacts within a short space of time. Our trial provides a framework for higher education institutions to use when evaluating their own (N)PAL programmes and may help to inform the design and implementation of such programmes throughout the global higher education sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02554-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer-Assisted Learning Improves Confidence and Educational Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomised Control Trial

D. B. Macdonald, Ferdinand J. O. Boucher, Tim W. Fawcett, Ellis Langley et al.
1 citations
Medical Science Educator
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

Peer-Assisted Learning Improves Confidence and Educational Outcomes: Evidence from a Randomised Control Trial

D. B. Macdonald, Ferdinand J. O. Boucher, Tim W. Fawcett, Ellis Langley, Amanda Pocklington, Bella A. Magner-Parsons
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The positive impact Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) and Near-Peer-Assisted Learning (NPAL) programmes have on student engagement, progression, and retention is supported by a wealth of previous studies and is reflected in the widespread adoption of (N)PAL programmes across higher education institutions. However, controlled investigations of the efficacy of (N)PAL programmes using quantifiable outcomes are limited. In this study, a within-participant randomised control trial was used to assess weekly learning and student confidence. Across four weeks, all participants attended (in counterbalanced order) an introductory (pre-lecture) NPAL session, a review (post-lecture) NPAL session, both introductory and review sessions, or a no-session control. Our data indicate that student attendance at the introductory NPAL session had a positive effect on their weekly test score ( p = .027) , response speed ( p = .050) and self-reported confidence score ( p = .006) in the same week that the session was delivered, whereas there was no detectable effect of attending the review NPAL session. These findings provide experimental evidence for a measurable, beneficial effect of NPAL programmes on student confidence and educational outcomes, suggesting a simple intervention can have positive impacts within a short space of time. Our trial provides a framework for higher education institutions to use when evaluating their own (N)PAL programmes and may help to inform the design and implementation of such programmes throughout the global higher education sector.

Medical Science Educator
University of St Andrews (GB), University of Exeter (GB)
University of Exeter
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.