Uniaxial compression tests of different types of encased recycled concrete aggregate columns

Encased recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) columns can be employed in soft soil foundations for enhancing bearing capacity, minimizing settlement, and expediting consolidation. This study examines the impact of various encased materials (iron mesh, aluminum mesh, rhombus and ellipse polyethylene mesh), gravel particle sizes (2-6 mm and 6-10 mm), and pile length–to–diameter ratios (5.71, 3.19, and 1.96) on the mechanical and deformation characteristics of encased RCA columns, using uniaxial compression tests. The findings reveal that iron mesh encased RCA columns exhibit higher pile top stress, whereas polyethylene mesh encased columns demonstrate greater radial deformation. When the quantity of gravel is consistent, larger gravel particle sizes tend to elevate the pile top stress of the encased RCA columns, while smaller gravel particle sizes tend to increase the bulging deformation. Throughout the compression process, encased RCA columns with larger length–to–diameter ratios undergo a bending phenomenon, whereas columns with smaller length–to–diameter ratios manifest an increase in the bulging strain rate. The study examines the stress–strain response and particle breakage of various encased RCA columns under uniaxial compression. The results inform the selection of encasement materials, RCA particle size, and pile diameter ratio, providing a scientific basis for using RCA in granular columns foundations for soft soil improvement and promoting sustainable reuse of construction waste.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100446
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uniaxial compression tests of different types of encased recycled concrete aggregate columns

Guangfa Gao, Chengliang Ji, Zhongfa Xie
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Uniaxial compression tests of different types of encased recycled concrete aggregate columns

Guangfa Gao, Chengliang Ji, Zhongfa Xie
article en

Abstract

Encased recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) columns can be employed in soft soil foundations for enhancing bearing capacity, minimizing settlement, and expediting consolidation. This study examines the impact of various encased materials (iron mesh, aluminum mesh, rhombus and ellipse polyethylene mesh), gravel particle sizes (2-6 mm and 6-10 mm), and pile length–to–diameter ratios (5.71, 3.19, and 1.96) on the mechanical and deformation characteristics of encased RCA columns, using uniaxial compression tests. The findings reveal that iron mesh encased RCA columns exhibit higher pile top stress, whereas polyethylene mesh encased columns demonstrate greater radial deformation. When the quantity of gravel is consistent, larger gravel particle sizes tend to elevate the pile top stress of the encased RCA columns, while smaller gravel particle sizes tend to increase the bulging deformation. Throughout the compression process, encased RCA columns with larger length–to–diameter ratios undergo a bending phenomenon, whereas columns with smaller length–to–diameter ratios manifest an increase in the bulging strain rate. The study examines the stress–strain response and particle breakage of various encased RCA columns under uniaxial compression. The results inform the selection of encasement materials, RCA particle size, and pile diameter ratio, providing a scientific basis for using RCA in granular columns foundations for soft soil improvement and promoting sustainable reuse of construction waste.

KSCE Journal of Civil EngineeringVol. 30(4)
Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.