Integrated environmental and techno-economic assessment for membrane-based gas-to-liquid process to green flare gas valorisation

This study provides a detailed techno-economic and environmental analysis of the Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) conversion process, comparing an innovative membrane-based design with the traditional GTL process. Both designs were validated through comprehensive simulations, with mass and energy balances aligned with literature data. Due to economic and environmental factors, the membrane-based design was iteratively refined to develop an efficient GTL configuration. Using an integrated environmental-economic algorithm, lifecycle assessment and economic analysis were conducted simultaneously. Results indicate that the total capital investment for the membrane-based design, approximately $1941 million, is 26 % lower than the conventional design, which costs $2616 million. Production costs in the membrane-based design decreased by about 10 %, reaching $1298 per ton compared to $1503 per ton for the conventional design. Additionally, the payback period and internal rate of return improved by 47 % and 86 %, respectively. Environmentally, the membrane-based design reduced the total carbon footprint by 14 % (from 41.20 to 20.83 tons of CO 2 per hour) and water footprint by 13 %. Other environmental impacts include reductions in acidification potential (19.4 %), eutrophication potential (19.6 %), ozone depletion potential (51.3 %), photochemical ozone creation potential (17.4 %), and human toxicity potential (22.3 %). Sensitivity analysis identified a flare gas flow rate of 138 kg per unit performance as the optimal balance between carbon footprint and payback period. This study demonstrates the superiority of the membrane-based design in maximizing the value of flare gas, offering an innovative solution for GTL processes. • Membrane GTL reduces total capital investment by 26 % (from 2616 to 1941 million USD). • CO₂ emissions decrease by 14 % (from 41.20 to 20.83 tons per hour) with membrane reactor. • Membrane reactor-based GTL lowers production cost by 10 % (from 1503 to 1298 USD per ton). • Optimal feed of 138 kg per functional unit achieves a 1.3-year payback period. • Ozone depletion potential reduced by 51.3 % in membrane GTL design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Processing Technology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108357
Primary Topic
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated environmental and techno-economic assessment for membrane-based gas-to-liquid process to green flare gas valorisation

Kamran Ghasemzadeh, Maria‐Chiara Ferrari, Adolfo Iulianelli, Mostafa Jafari et al.
Fuel Processing Technology
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
article

Integrated environmental and techno-economic assessment for membrane-based gas-to-liquid process to green flare gas valorisation

Kamran Ghasemzadeh, Maria‐Chiara Ferrari, Adolfo Iulianelli, Mostafa Jafari, Vincenzo Spallina, Yash Bansod
article en

Abstract

This study provides a detailed techno-economic and environmental analysis of the Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) conversion process, comparing an innovative membrane-based design with the traditional GTL process. Both designs were validated through comprehensive simulations, with mass and energy balances aligned with literature data. Due to economic and environmental factors, the membrane-based design was iteratively refined to develop an efficient GTL configuration. Using an integrated environmental-economic algorithm, lifecycle assessment and economic analysis were conducted simultaneously. Results indicate that the total capital investment for the membrane-based design, approximately $1941 million, is 26 % lower than the conventional design, which costs $2616 million. Production costs in the membrane-based design decreased by about 10 %, reaching $1298 per ton compared to $1503 per ton for the conventional design. Additionally, the payback period and internal rate of return improved by 47 % and 86 %, respectively. Environmentally, the membrane-based design reduced the total carbon footprint by 14 % (from 41.20 to 20.83 tons of CO 2 per hour) and water footprint by 13 %. Other environmental impacts include reductions in acidification potential (19.4 %), eutrophication potential (19.6 %), ozone depletion potential (51.3 %), photochemical ozone creation potential (17.4 %), and human toxicity potential (22.3 %). Sensitivity analysis identified a flare gas flow rate of 138 kg per unit performance as the optimal balance between carbon footprint and payback period. This study demonstrates the superiority of the membrane-based design in maximizing the value of flare gas, offering an innovative solution for GTL processes. • Membrane GTL reduces total capital investment by 26 % (from 2616 to 1941 million USD). • CO₂ emissions decrease by 14 % (from 41.20 to 20.83 tons per hour) with membrane reactor. • Membrane reactor-based GTL lowers production cost by 10 % (from 1503 to 1298 USD per ton). • Optimal feed of 138 kg per functional unit achieves a 1.3-year payback period. • Ozone depletion potential reduced by 51.3 % in membrane GTL design.

Fuel Processing TechnologyVol. 279
University of Tehran (IR), University of Manchester (GB), Institute on Membrane Technology (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.