Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review

Research on forest ecosystems is abundant, yet the societal needs for forest ecosystem services (FES) remains less examined. Understanding these needs—especially across different societal actors—offers a promising path to ease pressure on the provision of forest ecosystem services and navigate the goal conflicts of forest policy under the EU Green Deal. Using a semi-systematic literature review, we categorize the existing research on the need for forest ecosystem services within distinct European forestry paradigms and investigate how well the literature covers each service and actor type. In 107 assessed articles, we find that cultural ecosystem services are researched most prominently while provisioning services are addressed the least. While the literature in our corpus is inclined towards recreationists and the public, crucial actors such as forest owners or forest managers are examined seldomly. Furthermore, we find several articles that assess the synergies and conflicts fostered by different management approaches. We connect this finding to a qualitative mismatch between the need for forest ecosystem services described in the literature and the provision of these services that is shaped by different ideas on sustainable forest management. By highlighting gaps and shortcomings in the literature we set the stage for future research on the need for forest ecosystem services. • Most of the research on the need for FES in Europe considers cultural services. • Need for wood products is rarely addressed in key industries. • Research focuses on public, while forest owners and managers remain underexplored. • Research gaps can limit governance innovation in sustainable forest management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103663
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review

Liesbet Vranken, Eva Lieberherr, Kato Van Ruymbeke, Tamaki Ohmura et al.
3 citations
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Management and Policy
3.32
article

Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review

Liesbet Vranken, Eva Lieberherr, Kato Van Ruymbeke, Tamaki Ohmura, Timothy Rowe, Costanza Chimisso, Oliver Truffer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Research on forest ecosystems is abundant, yet the societal needs for forest ecosystem services (FES) remains less examined. Understanding these needs—especially across different societal actors—offers a promising path to ease pressure on the provision of forest ecosystem services and navigate the goal conflicts of forest policy under the EU Green Deal. Using a semi-systematic literature review, we categorize the existing research on the need for forest ecosystem services within distinct European forestry paradigms and investigate how well the literature covers each service and actor type. In 107 assessed articles, we find that cultural ecosystem services are researched most prominently while provisioning services are addressed the least. While the literature in our corpus is inclined towards recreationists and the public, crucial actors such as forest owners or forest managers are examined seldomly. Furthermore, we find several articles that assess the synergies and conflicts fostered by different management approaches. We connect this finding to a qualitative mismatch between the need for forest ecosystem services described in the literature and the provision of these services that is shaped by different ideas on sustainable forest management. By highlighting gaps and shortcomings in the literature we set the stage for future research on the need for forest ecosystem services. • Most of the research on the need for FES in Europe considers cultural services. • Need for wood products is rarely addressed in key industries. • Research focuses on public, while forest owners and managers remain underexplored. • Research gaps can limit governance innovation in sustainable forest management.

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 181
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forest Management and Policy
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.