Transformation of Global Science core–periphery structure towards a multi-polar horizon: The Rise of China and the Global South from 1980–2020

The global post-industrial shift has witnessed vast geo-political and technological transformations — but to what degree are they mirrored in the scientific enterprise? We examine the structure and dynamics of international collaboration networks from 1980 to 2020, which features the disruptive shift from the longstanding Anglophone duopoly to the multi-polar landscape of the 21st century. To this end, we develop a systematic framework for tracking core–periphery dynamics, which facilitates analyzing the structural factors underlying the ascendance of China and other global south nations. To provide a more granular perspective on the shifting geo-political role of the United States (US) within the global science system, we disaggregated cross-border publications by US states alongside other countries. Longitudinal analysis illustrates the global shift from Euro-American dominance to a multipolar system, with China emerging as a leader and facilitating the integration of its most active partners into the rich club of scientific production. This structural transformation has, nevertheless, altered the stability of longstanding systemic hierarchies and is reminiscent of the “Three-Body Problem” in dynamical systems theory, where the addition of massive poles reduces the system’s stability and predictability. Our findings also highlight the roles of overarching national (US) and transnational (European Union) innovation systems, and the expansive influence of large team science projects as two factors promoting global science integration. These insights provide a fresh perspective on the analysis of global science and its implications for national science policy development, offering strategies for global science countries to strengthen their positions in an increasingly integrated global science system. • Analyzed evolution of global science across nations and U.S. states from 1980-2020. • Core-periphery dynamics show emerging multi-polarity featuring China and Global South. • Global integration yields power shifts & instability, analogous to “Three-Body Problem”. • Innovation systems shape the structure and dynamics of global science integration. • Varied global integration pathways show that big science moderates national ascension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105370
Citations
4
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transformation of Global Science core–periphery structure towards a multi-polar horizon: The Rise of China and the Global South from 1980–2020

Alexander M. Petersen, A. Ramírez
4 citations
Research Policy
International Science and Diplomacy
34.09
article

Transformation of Global Science core–periphery structure towards a multi-polar horizon: The Rise of China and the Global South from 1980–2020

Alexander M. Petersen, A. Ramírez
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The global post-industrial shift has witnessed vast geo-political and technological transformations — but to what degree are they mirrored in the scientific enterprise? We examine the structure and dynamics of international collaboration networks from 1980 to 2020, which features the disruptive shift from the longstanding Anglophone duopoly to the multi-polar landscape of the 21st century. To this end, we develop a systematic framework for tracking core–periphery dynamics, which facilitates analyzing the structural factors underlying the ascendance of China and other global south nations. To provide a more granular perspective on the shifting geo-political role of the United States (US) within the global science system, we disaggregated cross-border publications by US states alongside other countries. Longitudinal analysis illustrates the global shift from Euro-American dominance to a multipolar system, with China emerging as a leader and facilitating the integration of its most active partners into the rich club of scientific production. This structural transformation has, nevertheless, altered the stability of longstanding systemic hierarchies and is reminiscent of the “Three-Body Problem” in dynamical systems theory, where the addition of massive poles reduces the system’s stability and predictability. Our findings also highlight the roles of overarching national (US) and transnational (European Union) innovation systems, and the expansive influence of large team science projects as two factors promoting global science integration. These insights provide a fresh perspective on the analysis of global science and its implications for national science policy development, offering strategies for global science countries to strengthen their positions in an increasingly integrated global science system. • Analyzed evolution of global science across nations and U.S. states from 1980-2020. • Core-periphery dynamics show emerging multi-polarity featuring China and Global South. • Global integration yields power shifts & instability, analogous to “Three-Body Problem”. • Innovation systems shape the structure and dynamics of global science integration. • Varied global integration pathways show that big science moderates national ascension.

Research PolicyVol. 55(1)
University of California, Merced (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
International Science and Diplomacy
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.