Strategies, practices, and challenges in enhancing quality assurance in qualitative biomedical research: A multi-method study protocol

Background:The qualitative research paradigm is crucial for understanding complex human phenomena, making credibility essential for its findings.Challenges in applying quality assessment criteria and promoting responsible practices in biomedical research underscore the need to review strategies, practices, and challenges in evaluating the quality of qualitative research.This protocol aims to support a multimethod study that develops evidence-informed, comprehensive, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research within the biomedical field.Methods: This multi-method study protocol consists of three phases: a systematic scoping review, qualitative content analysis, and a Delphi survey.The scoping review will follow Arksey and O'Malley's five-step approach, using relevant keywords to guide a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, with no time restrictions.Qualitative content analysis will follow Graneheim and Lundman's ( 2004) method.Purposeful sampling will be used to select experts in qualitative research.Semi-structured interviews will collect their experiences in evaluating qualitative research quality.Based on the review and interview findings, comprehensive, evidenceinformed, and practical recommendations within the biomedical field will be developed and further refined using the Delphi method. Conclusion:This study aims to critically examine quality achievement and evaluation in the qualitative paradigm and identify challenges, practices, and strategies through a review of existing evidence, focusing on related experiences and perceptions.The study also seeks to address gaps and controversies in the literature using qualitative content analysis.Ultimately, the goal is to develop comprehensive, evidenceinformed, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61882/jgbfnm.22.1.32
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies, practices, and challenges in enhancing quality assurance in qualitative biomedical research: A multi-method study protocol

Hamid Reza Khankeh, Mohammad Saatchi, Ulrich Dirnagl, Shima Shirozhan et al.
Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Strategies, practices, and challenges in enhancing quality assurance in qualitative biomedical research: A multi-method study protocol

Hamid Reza Khankeh, Mohammad Saatchi, Ulrich Dirnagl, Shima Shirozhan, Mahdieh Motie
article en

Abstract

Background:The qualitative research paradigm is crucial for understanding complex human phenomena, making credibility essential for its findings.Challenges in applying quality assessment criteria and promoting responsible practices in biomedical research underscore the need to review strategies, practices, and challenges in evaluating the quality of qualitative research.This protocol aims to support a multimethod study that develops evidence-informed, comprehensive, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research within the biomedical field.Methods: This multi-method study protocol consists of three phases: a systematic scoping review, qualitative content analysis, and a Delphi survey.The scoping review will follow Arksey and O'Malley's five-step approach, using relevant keywords to guide a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, with no time restrictions.Qualitative content analysis will follow Graneheim and Lundman's ( 2004) method.Purposeful sampling will be used to select experts in qualitative research.Semi-structured interviews will collect their experiences in evaluating qualitative research quality.Based on the review and interview findings, comprehensive, evidenceinformed, and practical recommendations within the biomedical field will be developed and further refined using the Delphi method. Conclusion:This study aims to critically examine quality achievement and evaluation in the qualitative paradigm and identify challenges, practices, and strategies through a review of existing evidence, focusing on related experiences and perceptions.The study also seeks to address gaps and controversies in the literature using qualitative content analysis.Ultimately, the goal is to develop comprehensive, evidenceinformed, and practical recommendations to enhance quality assurance in qualitative research.

Journal of Research Development in Nursing and MidwiferyVol. 22(1)
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR)
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.