On the Bias Distribution of Pseudo‐Linear Regression Algorithms for Recursive Identification

ABSTRACT This paper presents a detailed analysis of the asymptotic bias distribution of recursive identification schemes based on Pseudo‐Linear Regression. As shown in a previous article, the criterion asymptotically minimized is the variance of a non‐measurable signal (called the equivalent prediction error) when the system to be identified is in the model set. We prove a similar but slightly weaker (however still relevant) result when the true system does not belong to the model set, provided that the resulting bias remains small: if the bias tends towards 0, the stationary condition of the variance of the equivalent prediction error becomes identical to that of the criterion minimized by PLR. It is also shown that the open‐loop output error algorithm obtained with Pseudo‐Linear Regression provides a limit model which has the same bias distribution as the one obtained by the Instrumental Variable algorithm with auxiliary model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.70155
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Bias Distribution of Pseudo‐Linear Regression Algorithms for Recursive Identification

Henri Bourlès, Bernard Vau
International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
Control Systems and Identification
article

On the Bias Distribution of Pseudo‐Linear Regression Algorithms for Recursive Identification

Henri Bourlès, Bernard Vau
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents a detailed analysis of the asymptotic bias distribution of recursive identification schemes based on Pseudo‐Linear Regression. As shown in a previous article, the criterion asymptotically minimized is the variance of a non‐measurable signal (called the equivalent prediction error) when the system to be identified is in the model set. We prove a similar but slightly weaker (however still relevant) result when the true system does not belong to the model set, provided that the resulting bias remains small: if the bias tends towards 0, the stationary condition of the variance of the equivalent prediction error becomes identical to that of the criterion minimized by PLR. It is also shown that the open‐loop output error algorithm obtained with Pseudo‐Linear Regression provides a limit model which has the same bias distribution as the one obtained by the Instrumental Variable algorithm with auxiliary model.

International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), École Normale Supérieure (BI), Laboratoire des systèmes et applications des technologies de l'information et de l'énergie (FR), Laboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie Appliquée (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Control Systems and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.