Multi-scale analysis of the supply–demand relationship of soil conservation services in China

• Quantified soil conservation services supply and demand in China from 2010 to 2020. • Revealed scale effects on its spatial distribution across grid and administrative scales. • Proposed a multi-scale collaborative governance model to enhance soil conservation. Soil conservation is a vital ecosystem regulatory service for mitigating land degradation, yet its supply–demand dynamics across spatial scales are poorly understood. In this study, we employed the RUSLE model to quantify the supply and demand of soil conservation services (SCS) at a 1 km spatial resolution during the period from 2010 to 2020. Specifically, the supply of SCS was quantified as the difference between potential and actual soil erosion, whereas the actual soil erosion amount represented the demand. We further analyzed spatial patterns across multiple scales, including resampled grid resolutions and administrative units. The results revealed distinct temporal trends and spatial heterogeneity: supply declined and then recovered, while demand generally decreased. High supply-high demand areas were predominantly concentrated in Southwest China. Conversely, regions such as Northwest China and Tibet displayed a clear imbalance, where low supply coincided with high demand. The multi-scale analysis revealed pronounced scale effects, with administrative aggregation homogenizing spatial patterns and masking local heterogeneity. These shifts in supply–demand patterns highlight the sensitivity of ecosystem service assessments to scale effects. This study highlighted the need for multi-scale governance strategies to prevent macro-level policies from masking local imbalances, enabling precise ecological management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-scale analysis of the supply–demand relationship of soil conservation services in China

Qi Pang, Jie Xu, Ying Zhou
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Multi-scale analysis of the supply–demand relationship of soil conservation services in China

Qi Pang, Jie Xu, Ying Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Quantified soil conservation services supply and demand in China from 2010 to 2020. • Revealed scale effects on its spatial distribution across grid and administrative scales. • Proposed a multi-scale collaborative governance model to enhance soil conservation. Soil conservation is a vital ecosystem regulatory service for mitigating land degradation, yet its supply–demand dynamics across spatial scales are poorly understood. In this study, we employed the RUSLE model to quantify the supply and demand of soil conservation services (SCS) at a 1 km spatial resolution during the period from 2010 to 2020. Specifically, the supply of SCS was quantified as the difference between potential and actual soil erosion, whereas the actual soil erosion amount represented the demand. We further analyzed spatial patterns across multiple scales, including resampled grid resolutions and administrative units. The results revealed distinct temporal trends and spatial heterogeneity: supply declined and then recovered, while demand generally decreased. High supply-high demand areas were predominantly concentrated in Southwest China. Conversely, regions such as Northwest China and Tibet displayed a clear imbalance, where low supply coincided with high demand. The multi-scale analysis revealed pronounced scale effects, with administrative aggregation homogenizing spatial patterns and masking local heterogeneity. These shifts in supply–demand patterns highlight the sensitivity of ecosystem service assessments to scale effects. This study highlighted the need for multi-scale governance strategies to prevent macro-level policies from masking local imbalances, enabling precise ecological management.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 181
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.