Interventions for pre‐school children in foster care: A systematic review of the foster carer and system level outcomes from randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background Children in foster care are at increased risk of experiencing cognitive, emotional and behavioural difficulties. There is a window of opportunity for early intervention associated with developmental sensitivity in the early years. Foster carers and the systems supporting them play a central role in intervention and support for the young person. This systematic review explores the effectiveness of interventions for pre‐school children in foster care, in improving carer sensitivity, stress and placement stability. Methods Embase, Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library were search systematically for relevant articles, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available by 20th January 2025. Search screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were all completed by two independent researchers and reviewed collaboratively. The quality of included articles was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool and GRADE assessment procedure. Narrative synthesis with meta‐analysis for some outcomes was conducted. Results Sixteen articles, corresponding to 12 RCTs, met inclusion criteria. The quality of data according to GRADE assessment was low for all three outcome types, and RoB high for several included articles. The articles reviewed seven different intervention types. There was evidence that interventions were effective in improving caregiver sensitivity, with the strongest evidence supporting attachment and biobehavioural catch‐up and parent child interaction therapy. There was also limited evidence that interventions may improve placements stability. Overall, there was no evidence that interventions reduce caregiver stress. Conclusions This review demonstrates the effectiveness of interventions in improving caregiver and system level outcomes—both likely to be important mediators for change in the child. Further high‐quality research is needed to identify which interventions are most effective and in what context, with improved consistency in definition and measurement of outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70062
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions for pre‐school children in foster care: A systematic review of the foster carer and system level outcomes from randomised controlled trials

Nishant Jaiswal, Helen Minnis, Natalie Kirby, Camilla Biggs et al.
JCPP Advances
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Interventions for pre‐school children in foster care: A systematic review of the foster carer and system level outcomes from randomised controlled trials

Nishant Jaiswal, Helen Minnis, Natalie Kirby, Camilla Biggs, Fiona Turner, Gloria Cheung, Megan Garside
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Children in foster care are at increased risk of experiencing cognitive, emotional and behavioural difficulties. There is a window of opportunity for early intervention associated with developmental sensitivity in the early years. Foster carers and the systems supporting them play a central role in intervention and support for the young person. This systematic review explores the effectiveness of interventions for pre‐school children in foster care, in improving carer sensitivity, stress and placement stability. Methods Embase, Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library were search systematically for relevant articles, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) available by 20th January 2025. Search screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were all completed by two independent researchers and reviewed collaboratively. The quality of included articles was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool and GRADE assessment procedure. Narrative synthesis with meta‐analysis for some outcomes was conducted. Results Sixteen articles, corresponding to 12 RCTs, met inclusion criteria. The quality of data according to GRADE assessment was low for all three outcome types, and RoB high for several included articles. The articles reviewed seven different intervention types. There was evidence that interventions were effective in improving caregiver sensitivity, with the strongest evidence supporting attachment and biobehavioural catch‐up and parent child interaction therapy. There was also limited evidence that interventions may improve placements stability. Overall, there was no evidence that interventions reduce caregiver stress. Conclusions This review demonstrates the effectiveness of interventions in improving caregiver and system level outcomes—both likely to be important mediators for change in the child. Further high‐quality research is needed to identify which interventions are most effective and in what context, with improved consistency in definition and measurement of outcomes.

JCPP Advances
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, University of Glasgow, Public Health Research Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.