Ketamine for major depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Major depressive disorder (MDD) significantly impairs adolescents' development, with increasing rates of treatment resistance and suicide risk. Ketamine has emerged as a promising, rapid-acting antidepressant in adults, but its efficacy and safety in adolescents remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes of ketamine administration in youth with mood disorders. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42024568658), four studies were included, comprising 272 adolescents aged 12-18 years. Three studies (n = 189) contributed data to the meta-analysis. At 24 hours post-administration, ketamine showed a small, non-significant effect on depressive symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.04). Clinical response and remission were not significantly different between groups, but ketamine was associated with a significantly higher rate of suicidal ideation remission (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08). Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and consistent with known pharmacological effects. While findings support ketamine's potential role in acute presentations, current evidence is preliminary. Larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify the clinical utility, optimal protocols, and long-term safety of this approach in adolescent populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2025.2581238
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ketamine for major depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Isabel de Andrade Amato, Marcos V.V. Ribeiro, David G. Lopes, Camila Bertini Martins et al.
International Review of Psychiatry
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Ketamine for major depression in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Isabel de Andrade Amato, Marcos V.V. Ribeiro, David G. Lopes, Camila Bertini Martins, Acioly L.T. Lacerda, Sheila C. Caetano, Elson Asevedo, Rodrigo Marciano da Luz, Inês Vasconcelos Sousa Magalhães
article en

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) significantly impairs adolescents' development, with increasing rates of treatment resistance and suicide risk. Ketamine has emerged as a promising, rapid-acting antidepressant in adults, but its efficacy and safety in adolescents remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate short-term outcomes of ketamine administration in youth with mood disorders. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42024568658), four studies were included, comprising 272 adolescents aged 12-18 years. Three studies (n = 189) contributed data to the meta-analysis. At 24 hours post-administration, ketamine showed a small, non-significant effect on depressive symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.04). Clinical response and remission were not significantly different between groups, but ketamine was associated with a significantly higher rate of suicidal ideation remission (RR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08). Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and consistent with known pharmacological effects. While findings support ketamine's potential role in acute presentations, current evidence is preliminary. Larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify the clinical utility, optimal protocols, and long-term safety of this approach in adolescent populations.

International Review of PsychiatryVol. 37(6-7)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.