Measuring state functionality appreciation: A psychometric evaluation of an adapted version of the functionality appreciation scale (S-FAS)

Within the body functionality and body image research, there is an absence of psychometrically validated measures for capturing functionality appreciation as a state-like construct. To address this, we conducted an extensive psychometric analysis of a state version of the Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS; Alleva et al., 2017), initially offered by Alleva et al. (2024b), across two online studies. Exploratory factor analyses among a UK-based community sample of 583 adults (18-85 years; age M = 34.66) led to the extraction of a 7-item, unidimensional model of S-FAS scores, which presented adequate composite reliability and good patterns of construct validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, incremental). Using confirmatory factor analyses, we cross-validated the optimal model among a second community sample of 295 adults (18-78 years; age M = 38.65) from the United Kingdom. Results showed that the unidimensional model of S-FAS scores had adequate fit, demonstrated discriminant validity, and provided additional evidence of measurement invariance (up to latent mean level) across gender identity (women, men) and time (i.e., at pre-test and post-test). Our findings further showed that the S-FAS is sensitive to experimental manipulation and thus accurately captures changes in state functionality appreciation. Overall, the S-FAS is a psychometrically valid measure for assessing functionality appreciation as a state-like construct in future research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Body Image
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101996
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring state functionality appreciation: A psychometric evaluation of an adapted version of the functionality appreciation scale (S-FAS)

Tracy L. Tylka, Jessica M. Alleva, Phaedra Longhurst
Body Image
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Measuring state functionality appreciation: A psychometric evaluation of an adapted version of the functionality appreciation scale (S-FAS)

Tracy L. Tylka, Jessica M. Alleva, Phaedra Longhurst
article en

Abstract

Within the body functionality and body image research, there is an absence of psychometrically validated measures for capturing functionality appreciation as a state-like construct. To address this, we conducted an extensive psychometric analysis of a state version of the Functionality Appreciation Scale (FAS; Alleva et al., 2017), initially offered by Alleva et al. (2024b), across two online studies. Exploratory factor analyses among a UK-based community sample of 583 adults (18-85 years; age M = 34.66) led to the extraction of a 7-item, unidimensional model of S-FAS scores, which presented adequate composite reliability and good patterns of construct validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, incremental). Using confirmatory factor analyses, we cross-validated the optimal model among a second community sample of 295 adults (18-78 years; age M = 38.65) from the United Kingdom. Results showed that the unidimensional model of S-FAS scores had adequate fit, demonstrated discriminant validity, and provided additional evidence of measurement invariance (up to latent mean level) across gender identity (women, men) and time (i.e., at pre-test and post-test). Our findings further showed that the S-FAS is sensitive to experimental manipulation and thus accurately captures changes in state functionality appreciation. Overall, the S-FAS is a psychometrically valid measure for assessing functionality appreciation as a state-like construct in future research and practice.

Body ImageVol. 55
Maastricht University (NL), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.