S747 Effect of Diet on Weight Loss Outcomes in Patients After Bariatric Therapies

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged to be the most common bariatric intervention for weight loss in last decade. In some reports, vegetarianism has been reported to be associated with lower risk of diabetes, heart disease and all-cause mortality. Whether this dietary influence influences any weight loss outcomes in population remains to be seen. This study aims to compare weight loss profiles between vegetarian diet versus regular non-vegetarian diet patients who underwent SG over a year and evaluate whether there is any difference in outcomes due to dietary patterns. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent SG at our institute from 2018-2024. Patients were followed for a period of one year from laparoscopic SG (LSG) for weight loss outcomes. Demographics, dietary patterns, AEs, and weight profiles were collected. The primary outcome was total weight loss (TWL) and %TWL comparisons between patients who took vegetarian diet versus regular non-vegetarian diet. Secondary outcomes included comparison of adverse events (AEs). A Fisher exact test was used to compare the AE rate, and a student t-test was used for weight comparisons. Results: One hundred forty-two vegetarian (group 1) and 1,557 non-vegetarian diet (group 2) patients were included who underwent LSG. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Mean preoperative weight (pounds) was 266 ± 91 and 271.68 ± 58.8 in Groups 1 and 2, while body mass index (Kg/m2) was 43.6 ± 8.5 and 44.3 ± 8.18. Total weight loss (TWL) (pounds) between Group 1 and 2 at 6 and 12 months were (52.06 ± 22.2 and 52.24 ± 24.18, P = 0.93) and (60.52 ± 27 and 62.6 ± 30.6, P = 0.46) respectively. %TWL in groups 1 and 2 were (19.26 ± 6.73 and 19.18 ± 7.63, P = 0.90) and (22.65 ± 9.64 and 23.19 ± 9.81, P = 0.56) at 6 and 12 months. The AE rate in the vegetarian group (0%) was lower than the non-vegetarian group (0.32%) but not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in weight loss at 6 months and 1 year. Weight comparisons between preoperative weight and 6- or 12-months weight was statistically significant in either group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Dietary behavior does not influence change in outcomes after bariatric therapy with SG. Lower adverse events were seen in vegetarian patients without any significant difference. Further studies of dietary behavior in larger populations with surgical as well as endoscopic bariatric therapies can shed more light into the influence of dietary behavior and weight loss outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130448.35584.48
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S747 Effect of Diet on Weight Loss Outcomes in Patients After Bariatric Therapies

Neel Chandel, Vishal Chandel
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S747 Effect of Diet on Weight Loss Outcomes in Patients After Bariatric Therapies

Neel Chandel, Vishal Chandel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged to be the most common bariatric intervention for weight loss in last decade. In some reports, vegetarianism has been reported to be associated with lower risk of diabetes, heart disease and all-cause mortality. Whether this dietary influence influences any weight loss outcomes in population remains to be seen. This study aims to compare weight loss profiles between vegetarian diet versus regular non-vegetarian diet patients who underwent SG over a year and evaluate whether there is any difference in outcomes due to dietary patterns. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent SG at our institute from 2018-2024. Patients were followed for a period of one year from laparoscopic SG (LSG) for weight loss outcomes. Demographics, dietary patterns, AEs, and weight profiles were collected. The primary outcome was total weight loss (TWL) and %TWL comparisons between patients who took vegetarian diet versus regular non-vegetarian diet. Secondary outcomes included comparison of adverse events (AEs). A Fisher exact test was used to compare the AE rate, and a student t-test was used for weight comparisons. Results: One hundred forty-two vegetarian (group 1) and 1,557 non-vegetarian diet (group 2) patients were included who underwent LSG. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Mean preoperative weight (pounds) was 266 ± 91 and 271.68 ± 58.8 in Groups 1 and 2, while body mass index (Kg/m2) was 43.6 ± 8.5 and 44.3 ± 8.18. Total weight loss (TWL) (pounds) between Group 1 and 2 at 6 and 12 months were (52.06 ± 22.2 and 52.24 ± 24.18, P = 0.93) and (60.52 ± 27 and 62.6 ± 30.6, P = 0.46) respectively. %TWL in groups 1 and 2 were (19.26 ± 6.73 and 19.18 ± 7.63, P = 0.90) and (22.65 ± 9.64 and 23.19 ± 9.81, P = 0.56) at 6 and 12 months. The AE rate in the vegetarian group (0%) was lower than the non-vegetarian group (0.32%) but not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in weight loss at 6 months and 1 year. Weight comparisons between preoperative weight and 6- or 12-months weight was statistically significant in either group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Dietary behavior does not influence change in outcomes after bariatric therapy with SG. Lower adverse events were seen in vegetarian patients without any significant difference. Further studies of dietary behavior in larger populations with surgical as well as endoscopic bariatric therapies can shed more light into the influence of dietary behavior and weight loss outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.