S679 From Screening to Diagnosis: The Impact of Patient Navigation Services on Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test

Introduction: One third of the eligible US population fails to undergo routine CRC screening. ACG’s Clinical Guidelines suggest utilizing patient navigators to improve adherence. We have previously shown that navigators can significantly increase return rates for FIT, helping prioritize patients for diagnostic colonoscopies. The critical next step is ensuring that patients with positive FIT go on to complete colonoscopy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient adherence from referral to completion of colonoscopy after positive FIT. Our dataset included 7148 FIT kit orders between 01/2017–09/2024; a dedicated patient navigator was introduced in 01/2021 to support FIT kit return. We examined the impact of this intervention on subsequent colonoscopy completion. Descriptive analyses (via SAS version 9.4) were performed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests. A multivariable linear regression model was used to compare pre- and post-intervention. Models were adjusted for gender, age, race and language. Results: There were 289 positive FIT results; 147 post- and 142 pre-intervention. Following positive FIT, 94.5% of patients received a referral for colonoscopy, with an average of 22.3 days from positive FIT to referral; overall rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months was 32.5% (no significant difference between groups for any of these metrics). However, time from referral to completion was significantly shorter post-intervention (160.7 ± 178.4 vs 360.7 ± 577.0 days; P = 0.0174). This reduction in wait time was even more pronounced in key subgroups (age 51-64: 146.4 ± 134.1 vs 370.1 ± 597.2, P = 0.0481; White/White: 124.4 ± 84.7 vs 461.1 ± 653.9, P = 0.015; Medicare: 113.1 ± 93.0 vs 340.6 ± 489.9, P = 0.0330; English-speaking: 172.8 ± 205.6 vs 480.9 ± 661.5, P = 0.0152). Conclusion: We explored longitudinal adherence to CRC screening via colonoscopy after the original intervention of patient navigator to support FIT kit return. Time from colonoscopy referral to completion was significantly shorter post-intervention. This improvement was likely 2-fold: (1) With our intervention our schedulers became more attentive to positive FIT referrals; they in turn altered their IT scheduling support tools to focus on getting these patients scheduled in a timely manner. (2) Patients, due to prior navigation efforts, may have better understood the importance of a positive result and were thus more motivated to complete colonoscopy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130176.48722.bd
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S679 From Screening to Diagnosis: The Impact of Patient Navigation Services on Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test

Ricky D. Grisson, Ross Hilliard, Harlan Rich, João Monteiro et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S679 From Screening to Diagnosis: The Impact of Patient Navigation Services on Timely Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test

Ricky D. Grisson, Ross Hilliard, Harlan Rich, João Monteiro, Hannah W. F. Goodrich, Carrie Brdiges-Feliz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: One third of the eligible US population fails to undergo routine CRC screening. ACG’s Clinical Guidelines suggest utilizing patient navigators to improve adherence. We have previously shown that navigators can significantly increase return rates for FIT, helping prioritize patients for diagnostic colonoscopies. The critical next step is ensuring that patients with positive FIT go on to complete colonoscopy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient adherence from referral to completion of colonoscopy after positive FIT. Our dataset included 7148 FIT kit orders between 01/2017–09/2024; a dedicated patient navigator was introduced in 01/2021 to support FIT kit return. We examined the impact of this intervention on subsequent colonoscopy completion. Descriptive analyses (via SAS version 9.4) were performed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests. A multivariable linear regression model was used to compare pre- and post-intervention. Models were adjusted for gender, age, race and language. Results: There were 289 positive FIT results; 147 post- and 142 pre-intervention. Following positive FIT, 94.5% of patients received a referral for colonoscopy, with an average of 22.3 days from positive FIT to referral; overall rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months was 32.5% (no significant difference between groups for any of these metrics). However, time from referral to completion was significantly shorter post-intervention (160.7 ± 178.4 vs 360.7 ± 577.0 days; P = 0.0174). This reduction in wait time was even more pronounced in key subgroups (age 51-64: 146.4 ± 134.1 vs 370.1 ± 597.2, P = 0.0481; White/White: 124.4 ± 84.7 vs 461.1 ± 653.9, P = 0.015; Medicare: 113.1 ± 93.0 vs 340.6 ± 489.9, P = 0.0330; English-speaking: 172.8 ± 205.6 vs 480.9 ± 661.5, P = 0.0152). Conclusion: We explored longitudinal adherence to CRC screening via colonoscopy after the original intervention of patient navigator to support FIT kit return. Time from colonoscopy referral to completion was significantly shorter post-intervention. This improvement was likely 2-fold: (1) With our intervention our schedulers became more attentive to positive FIT referrals; they in turn altered their IT scheduling support tools to focus on getting these patients scheduled in a timely manner. (2) Patients, due to prior navigation efforts, may have better understood the importance of a positive result and were thus more motivated to complete colonoscopy.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.