S686 Privacy‐Preserving Federated Deep Learning for Robust Multicenter Colorectal Polyp Classification

Introduction: Early colorectal polyp detection via colonoscopy reduces cancer incidence, but privacy regulations hinder pooling endoscopic images. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without centralizing raw data. We created an FL framework using the Endoscopic Image and Video Dataset for Recognition of Colorectal Polyps Morphology and Pathology (ERCPMP) v5 dataset and simulated site‐specific subsets to develop a robust multicenter polyp classifier. Methods: ERCPMPv5 comprises 796 RGB images and 21 videos from 191 patients (Olympus colonoscope, 368 × 256 pixels), annotated with Paris, Pit, JNET, and histopathological (tubular, villous, tubulovillous, hyperplastic, serrated, inflammatory, adenocarcinoma) labels. We randomly split images into 5 nonoverlapping subsets (\∼160/site), ensuring proportional subtype and quality representation. Each site fine‐tuned a ResNet‐50 backbone (pretrained on ImageNet) for 5 local epochs per communication round, using categorical cross‐entropy loss, the Adam optimizer (learning rate 1 × 10⁻⁴), and data augmentation (rotations ±10°, brightness ±15%, flips). Filenames encoded pathology and JNET class for label extraction. After local updates, encrypted weights were federated via Federated Averaging (FedAvg) over 50 rounds. The global model was then fine‐tuned on a validation set (ERCPMP supplementary: n = 120; external: n = 300). Final evaluation used a hold‐out test set (150 images/site; n = 750), balanced by subtype and resolution. Results: The federated model achieved an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.96) and 89.2% subtype accuracy. Adenomatous sensitivity was 92.5% (CI, 90.7%–94.2%) and specificity 90.3% (CI, 88.5%–92.0%). Fine‐tuning raised AUC to 0.96 (CI, 0.95–0.97), sensitivity to 94.1%, and specificity to 91.7%. Site‐specific AUCs ranged from 0.94 to 0.96, indicating consistent performance. Conclusion: Our FL framework using ERCPMPv5 achieved performance comparable to centralized training while preserving privacy. Fine‐tuning on supplemental data enhanced generalizability. This approach enables multicenter deployment of AI tools for colorectal polyp detection under strict privacy constraints.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130204.00832.32
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S686 Privacy‐Preserving Federated Deep Learning for Robust Multicenter Colorectal Polyp Classification

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

S686 Privacy‐Preserving Federated Deep Learning for Robust Multicenter Colorectal Polyp Classification

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz, Sachin Sravan Kumar Komati, Sai Lakshmi Prasanna Komati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Early colorectal polyp detection via colonoscopy reduces cancer incidence, but privacy regulations hinder pooling endoscopic images. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without centralizing raw data. We created an FL framework using the Endoscopic Image and Video Dataset for Recognition of Colorectal Polyps Morphology and Pathology (ERCPMP) v5 dataset and simulated site‐specific subsets to develop a robust multicenter polyp classifier. Methods: ERCPMPv5 comprises 796 RGB images and 21 videos from 191 patients (Olympus colonoscope, 368 × 256 pixels), annotated with Paris, Pit, JNET, and histopathological (tubular, villous, tubulovillous, hyperplastic, serrated, inflammatory, adenocarcinoma) labels. We randomly split images into 5 nonoverlapping subsets (\∼160/site), ensuring proportional subtype and quality representation. Each site fine‐tuned a ResNet‐50 backbone (pretrained on ImageNet) for 5 local epochs per communication round, using categorical cross‐entropy loss, the Adam optimizer (learning rate 1 × 10⁻⁴), and data augmentation (rotations ±10°, brightness ±15%, flips). Filenames encoded pathology and JNET class for label extraction. After local updates, encrypted weights were federated via Federated Averaging (FedAvg) over 50 rounds. The global model was then fine‐tuned on a validation set (ERCPMP supplementary: n = 120; external: n = 300). Final evaluation used a hold‐out test set (150 images/site; n = 750), balanced by subtype and resolution. Results: The federated model achieved an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.96) and 89.2% subtype accuracy. Adenomatous sensitivity was 92.5% (CI, 90.7%–94.2%) and specificity 90.3% (CI, 88.5%–92.0%). Fine‐tuning raised AUC to 0.96 (CI, 0.95–0.97), sensitivity to 94.1%, and specificity to 91.7%. Site‐specific AUCs ranged from 0.94 to 0.96, indicating consistent performance. Conclusion: Our FL framework using ERCPMPv5 achieved performance comparable to centralized training while preserving privacy. Fine‐tuning on supplemental data enhanced generalizability. This approach enables multicenter deployment of AI tools for colorectal polyp detection under strict privacy constraints.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.