S734 Questioning the Efficacy of Dietary Interventions in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Insights From a Multi-Institutional Real-World Clinical Data Network

Introduction: Although eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively rare disorder, its incidence has risen sharply over the past decade. Believed to be an allergic condition, dietary interventions are considered a cornerstone of management, with studies demonstrating histological remission in adherents. However, these lifestyle modifications can be challenging, costly, and impractical for most. Thus, we aim to conduct this study to assess if there are significant differences in outcomes for patients who received dietary counseling. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX database to identify patients ≥18 years old with EoE confirmed with endoscopic evaluation who had not received dietary or nutritional counseling in the past year. We divided these patients into 2 cohorts: EoE with and without dietary counseling. We then conducted 1:1 propensity score matching, balancing demographic variables. Outcomes were assessed 3 months to 1 year after diagnosis of EoE and included repeat EGD, food impaction, urgent care/ER visits, need for topical steroids, and dupilumab initiation. We analyzed the measures of association in the form of odds ratio (OR), reporting a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-value. Results: Overall, 33,145 patients ≥18 years of age with EoE were identified. Of these, 32,841 did not get formal dietary counseling, and 304 did. After propensity score matching, there were 304 patients in each cohort. Compared to patients with EoE without dietary counseling, patients with dietary counseling had no significant difference in the need for repeat EGD (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.71-1.59, P 0.76), food impaction (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.41-2.44, P 1.00)], urgent care/ER visits (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49-1.36, P = 0.44), topical steroid use (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.59-1.51, P = 0.81), and dupilumab initiation (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.41-2.44, P = 1.00). Conclusion: Our findings from real-world data demonstrate that despite dietary counseling, there was no significant difference in complications due to EoE in our cohort. This underscores the need to rethink our approach to managing EoE with more feasible and efficacious interventions to prevent complications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130396.64760.e6
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S734 Questioning the Efficacy of Dietary Interventions in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Insights From a Multi-Institutional Real-World Clinical Data Network

Imran Qureshi, Sanmeet Singh, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim Kazi
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

S734 Questioning the Efficacy of Dietary Interventions in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Insights From a Multi-Institutional Real-World Clinical Data Network

Imran Qureshi, Sanmeet Singh, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim Kazi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Although eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively rare disorder, its incidence has risen sharply over the past decade. Believed to be an allergic condition, dietary interventions are considered a cornerstone of management, with studies demonstrating histological remission in adherents. However, these lifestyle modifications can be challenging, costly, and impractical for most. Thus, we aim to conduct this study to assess if there are significant differences in outcomes for patients who received dietary counseling. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX database to identify patients ≥18 years old with EoE confirmed with endoscopic evaluation who had not received dietary or nutritional counseling in the past year. We divided these patients into 2 cohorts: EoE with and without dietary counseling. We then conducted 1:1 propensity score matching, balancing demographic variables. Outcomes were assessed 3 months to 1 year after diagnosis of EoE and included repeat EGD, food impaction, urgent care/ER visits, need for topical steroids, and dupilumab initiation. We analyzed the measures of association in the form of odds ratio (OR), reporting a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-value. Results: Overall, 33,145 patients ≥18 years of age with EoE were identified. Of these, 32,841 did not get formal dietary counseling, and 304 did. After propensity score matching, there were 304 patients in each cohort. Compared to patients with EoE without dietary counseling, patients with dietary counseling had no significant difference in the need for repeat EGD (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.71-1.59, P 0.76), food impaction (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.41-2.44, P 1.00)], urgent care/ER visits (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49-1.36, P = 0.44), topical steroid use (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.59-1.51, P = 0.81), and dupilumab initiation (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.41-2.44, P = 1.00). Conclusion: Our findings from real-world data demonstrate that despite dietary counseling, there was no significant difference in complications due to EoE in our cohort. This underscores the need to rethink our approach to managing EoE with more feasible and efficacious interventions to prevent complications.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.