S714 The Financial Divide: Insurance Coverage and Its Impact on Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Access to healthcare, which is often influenced by insurance status, plays a critical role in timely diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in patients with CRC. Uninsured or underinsured individuals may face barriers to receiving optimal care like screening colonoscopies, potentially leading to increased incidence and worse outcomes during hospitalizations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of insurance status on prevalence of CRC. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult hospitalizations with CRC. The primary payer was categorized as Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and others. National admission estimates were calculated using sample weights, and mortality and morbidity outcomes were analyzed based on payer type. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the association between insurance type and incidence of CRC and its outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: A total of 1,390,475 CRC-related hospitalizations were identified, with a mean patient age of 66.57 years. Of these, 48.2% were female. The majority of hospitalizations were covered by Medicare (57%), followed by private insurance (28%), Medicaid (10%), and other payers (4.5%) (P < 0.001). In terms of race/ethnicity, White patients accounted for 70% of CRC hospitalizations, followed by Black (14%) and Hispanic (9%) patients (P < 0.001). Geographically, 40% of CRC admissions were from the southern United States, with 70% occurring in urban teaching hospitals. The prevalence of CRC hospitalizations was significantly higher among patients with Medicaid and private insurance compared to those with Medicare. Similarly, mortality outcomes revealed higher mortality rates among hospitalizations with Medicaid and private insurance compared to Medicare. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed these associations, indicating that insurance type is an independent predictor of mortality in CRC hospitalizations. Conclusion: Insurance status significantly impacts the incidence and mortality of CRC hospitalizations. Patients with Medicaid and private insurance experience higher mortality rates compared to those with Medicare, highlighting disparities in access to care and outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130316.00459.f2
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S714 The Financial Divide: Insurance Coverage and Its Impact on Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

Hamsika Moparty, Manasa Ginjupalli, Sweta Lohani, Chirag S. Desai et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

S714 The Financial Divide: Insurance Coverage and Its Impact on Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

Hamsika Moparty, Manasa Ginjupalli, Sweta Lohani, Chirag S. Desai, Vikash Kumar, Jayalekshmi Jayakumar, Anuj Sharma, Kalimullah Quadri
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Access to healthcare, which is often influenced by insurance status, plays a critical role in timely diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in patients with CRC. Uninsured or underinsured individuals may face barriers to receiving optimal care like screening colonoscopies, potentially leading to increased incidence and worse outcomes during hospitalizations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of insurance status on prevalence of CRC. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult hospitalizations with CRC. The primary payer was categorized as Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and others. National admission estimates were calculated using sample weights, and mortality and morbidity outcomes were analyzed based on payer type. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the association between insurance type and incidence of CRC and its outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, hospital characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: A total of 1,390,475 CRC-related hospitalizations were identified, with a mean patient age of 66.57 years. Of these, 48.2% were female. The majority of hospitalizations were covered by Medicare (57%), followed by private insurance (28%), Medicaid (10%), and other payers (4.5%) (P < 0.001). In terms of race/ethnicity, White patients accounted for 70% of CRC hospitalizations, followed by Black (14%) and Hispanic (9%) patients (P < 0.001). Geographically, 40% of CRC admissions were from the southern United States, with 70% occurring in urban teaching hospitals. The prevalence of CRC hospitalizations was significantly higher among patients with Medicaid and private insurance compared to those with Medicare. Similarly, mortality outcomes revealed higher mortality rates among hospitalizations with Medicaid and private insurance compared to Medicare. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed these associations, indicating that insurance type is an independent predictor of mortality in CRC hospitalizations. Conclusion: Insurance status significantly impacts the incidence and mortality of CRC hospitalizations. Patients with Medicaid and private insurance experience higher mortality rates compared to those with Medicare, highlighting disparities in access to care and outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.