S683 Real-Time Multimodal Transformer Pipeline for Dynamic Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Growth and Malignancy Risk

Introduction: Colorectal polyp characterization guides surveillance and treatment but depends heavily on subjective endoscopic judgment. Automated image‐based classifiers improved static lesion assessment yet often ignored dynamic morphological changes and patient factors. Methods: We used the ERC PMP-v5 dataset with high-resolution endoscopic videos, expert annotations, and clinical data from 217 patients. Video frames were sampled every 6 seconds; polyp areas were cropped and resized to 224 × 224 pixels. Each frame was linked to tabular variables (size, dysplasia grade, demographics). Data were split at the patient level: 70% training, 15% validation, 15% test. Our pipeline fine-tuned a Vision Transformer (ViT-B/16) pretrained on ImageNet to extract spatial embeddings. Sequences of 8 consecutive frame embeddings fed into a 4-layer Transformer encoder to capture temporal morphology changes. From this representation, we added (a) an LSTM regression head to predict polyp size trajectories and (b) a dense classification head to predict morphological transitions (e.g., tubular → villous → adenocarcinoma). For malignancy risk, ViT features were fused with patient metadata via a fully connected network. All components were optimized end-to-end with AdamW (learning rate 1 × 10⁻⁴), cosine annealing, and early stopping on validation loss. Performance metrics included mean absolute error, classification accuracy, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The size-prediction model achieved an MAE of 0.0689 cm on held-out data. Morphology classification reached 85% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.84. The fusion network distinguished malignant from benign lesions with 99.89% accuracy, AUC = 0.997, sensitivity = 98.5%, and specificity = 99.2%. Risk stratification aligned strongly with histopathology: 92% of high-risk predictions corresponded to confirmed malignancy. Recurrence prediction yielded a balanced accuracy of 94%. Inference ran at 18 frames per second on a single GPU, enabling real-time frame-level analysis and decision support. Conclusion: Our pipeline achieved submillimeter accuracy in size forecasting and near‐perfect discrimination between benign and malignant lesions. Integrating temporal morphology with patient information outperformed models limited to single‐frame analysis. Running at 18 frames per second on standard hardware, the framework can deploy directly in endoscopy suites, offering immediate decision support and the potential to streamline polyp management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130192.95065.1f
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S683 Real-Time Multimodal Transformer Pipeline for Dynamic Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Growth and Malignancy Risk

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S683 Real-Time Multimodal Transformer Pipeline for Dynamic Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Growth and Malignancy Risk

Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz, Sarath Chandra Ponnada, Sachin Sravan Kumar Komati, Sai Lakshmi Prasanna Komati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal polyp characterization guides surveillance and treatment but depends heavily on subjective endoscopic judgment. Automated image‐based classifiers improved static lesion assessment yet often ignored dynamic morphological changes and patient factors. Methods: We used the ERC PMP-v5 dataset with high-resolution endoscopic videos, expert annotations, and clinical data from 217 patients. Video frames were sampled every 6 seconds; polyp areas were cropped and resized to 224 × 224 pixels. Each frame was linked to tabular variables (size, dysplasia grade, demographics). Data were split at the patient level: 70% training, 15% validation, 15% test. Our pipeline fine-tuned a Vision Transformer (ViT-B/16) pretrained on ImageNet to extract spatial embeddings. Sequences of 8 consecutive frame embeddings fed into a 4-layer Transformer encoder to capture temporal morphology changes. From this representation, we added (a) an LSTM regression head to predict polyp size trajectories and (b) a dense classification head to predict morphological transitions (e.g., tubular → villous → adenocarcinoma). For malignancy risk, ViT features were fused with patient metadata via a fully connected network. All components were optimized end-to-end with AdamW (learning rate 1 × 10⁻⁴), cosine annealing, and early stopping on validation loss. Performance metrics included mean absolute error, classification accuracy, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The size-prediction model achieved an MAE of 0.0689 cm on held-out data. Morphology classification reached 85% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.84. The fusion network distinguished malignant from benign lesions with 99.89% accuracy, AUC = 0.997, sensitivity = 98.5%, and specificity = 99.2%. Risk stratification aligned strongly with histopathology: 92% of high-risk predictions corresponded to confirmed malignancy. Recurrence prediction yielded a balanced accuracy of 94%. Inference ran at 18 frames per second on a single GPU, enabling real-time frame-level analysis and decision support. Conclusion: Our pipeline achieved submillimeter accuracy in size forecasting and near‐perfect discrimination between benign and malignant lesions. Integrating temporal morphology with patient information outperformed models limited to single‐frame analysis. Running at 18 frames per second on standard hardware, the framework can deploy directly in endoscopy suites, offering immediate decision support and the potential to streamline polyp management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.