S829 Efficacy of Esomeprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of esomeprazole in both induction and maintenance of healing in erosive esophagitis (EE) using data from randomized controlled trials. EE, a gastroesophageal reflux disease subtype, involves visible esophageal mucosal injury. While prior meta-analyses assessed proton pump inhibitors as a class, few focused exclusively on esomeprazole across both phases. This study consolidates esomeprazole-specific randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, providing a focused analysis across comparators, dosages, and treatment durations. Methods: This meta-analysis included 5 treatment-control comparisons from 3 RCTs evaluating esomeprazole (40 mg, 20 mg, 10 mg) for healing or maintenance of EE. Controls included omeprazole, pantoprazole, or placebo. Primary outcome was endoscopic healing at 4-8 weeks or maintenance at 6 months. Log risk ratios (lnRR) and variances were calculated. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q, I², and τ². Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Results: The meta-analysis included 5 comparisons with 3,885 patients. Esomeprazole showed a pooled RR of 1.074 (95% CI 1.040-1.108; P < 0.0001) compared to controls, with each trial reporting higher healing or maintenance rates in the esomeprazole arm. Heterogeneity was high (Q = 152.13, df = 4; P < 0.0001; I² = 97.37%; τ² = 0.0205), likely due to differences in dosing, comparators (omeprazole, pantoprazole, placebo), and timing of outcome assessments. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible small-study effects, though interpretation is limited by the small number of studies. By consolidating RCTs focused solely on esomeprazole across both treatment phases, this analysis provides a clearer assessment of its efficacy, demonstrating a consistent and statistically significant benefit despite inter-study variability. Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that esomeprazole was associated with a statistically significant increase in healing and maintenance rates in erosive esophagitis across randomized controlled trials. Observed variability between studies warrants consideration in future comparative trials using standardized methodologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130776.31076.37
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S829 Efficacy of Esomeprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Savanna Thor, Madia Ahad, Anwar Uddin, Rahat Uddin et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S829 Efficacy of Esomeprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Savanna Thor, Madia Ahad, Anwar Uddin, Rahat Uddin, Aregawi Bihon
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of esomeprazole in both induction and maintenance of healing in erosive esophagitis (EE) using data from randomized controlled trials. EE, a gastroesophageal reflux disease subtype, involves visible esophageal mucosal injury. While prior meta-analyses assessed proton pump inhibitors as a class, few focused exclusively on esomeprazole across both phases. This study consolidates esomeprazole-specific randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, providing a focused analysis across comparators, dosages, and treatment durations. Methods: This meta-analysis included 5 treatment-control comparisons from 3 RCTs evaluating esomeprazole (40 mg, 20 mg, 10 mg) for healing or maintenance of EE. Controls included omeprazole, pantoprazole, or placebo. Primary outcome was endoscopic healing at 4-8 weeks or maintenance at 6 months. Log risk ratios (lnRR) and variances were calculated. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q, I², and τ². Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Results: The meta-analysis included 5 comparisons with 3,885 patients. Esomeprazole showed a pooled RR of 1.074 (95% CI 1.040-1.108; P < 0.0001) compared to controls, with each trial reporting higher healing or maintenance rates in the esomeprazole arm. Heterogeneity was high (Q = 152.13, df = 4; P < 0.0001; I² = 97.37%; τ² = 0.0205), likely due to differences in dosing, comparators (omeprazole, pantoprazole, placebo), and timing of outcome assessments. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible small-study effects, though interpretation is limited by the small number of studies. By consolidating RCTs focused solely on esomeprazole across both treatment phases, this analysis provides a clearer assessment of its efficacy, demonstrating a consistent and statistically significant benefit despite inter-study variability. Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that esomeprazole was associated with a statistically significant increase in healing and maintenance rates in erosive esophagitis across randomized controlled trials. Observed variability between studies warrants consideration in future comparative trials using standardized methodologies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.