S688 Integrated Clinical and Endoscopic Imaging Model Accurately Predicts Colorectal Polyp Recurrence

Introduction: Identifying patients at high risk for colorectal polyp recurrence remains an unmet need in endoscopic practice. Conventional guidelines rely on polyp size and histologic grade but often misclassify borderline cases. By blending endoscopic image analysis with structured clinical data, a predictive model may provide more accurate, personalized surveillance recommendations and reduce unnecessary procedures. Methods: We retrospectively assembled a cohort from the Endoscopic Image and Video Dataset for Recognition of Colorectal Polyps Morphology and Pathology-v5 repository, pairing high-resolution polyp images with corresponding clinical metadata: size, morphology, dysplasia grade, and prior recurrence. We standardized clinical inputs and resize all images to 224 × 224 pixels. An EfficientNet-V2 backbone extracted radiomic features, while a fully connected network processed clinical variables. We fused these embeddings in a late-fusion stage, then applied an ensemble prediction head combining Gradient Boosting and a multilayer perceptron. We trained the model using binary cross-entropy loss, calibrated probabilities via isotonic regression, and stratified outputs into Low (36-month follow-up), Moderate (12–24 months), and High (3–6 months) risk categories. Model performance was assessed on a held-out test set using accuracy, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and test loss. SHAP analysis determined feature contributions. Results: On unseen data, the fusion ensemble achieved 91.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.932. Sensitivity measured 89.7%, specificity reached 93.5%, and test loss was 0.0013. Calibration curves showed minimal deviation between predicted and observed recurrence probabilities (Brier score 0.038). SHAP rankings consistently placed polyp size first, followed by dysplasia grade and recurrence history; image-derived textural descriptors improved discrimination in equivocal cases. Risk stratification aligned with actual recurrence rates: Low—5.4%, Moderate—23.8%, High—68.7%. Feature importance remained stable across cross-validation folds. Conclusion: By integrating endoscopic radiomics with clinical parameters, our model delivered high accuracy and reliable risk stratification for polyp recurrence. Key predictors—lesion size, histologic grade, and recurrence history—align with established risk factors, while radiomic features capture subtle image patterns. This approach offers a scalable tool to tailor surveillance intervals and may reduce unnecessary colonoscopies. Prospective validation will determine its generalizability across diverse practice settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130212.53165.38
Primary Topic
Applied Advanced Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S688 Integrated Clinical and Endoscopic Imaging Model Accurately Predicts Colorectal Polyp Recurrence

Anoop S. Chandrashekar, Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Applied Advanced Technologies
article

S688 Integrated Clinical and Endoscopic Imaging Model Accurately Predicts Colorectal Polyp Recurrence

Anoop S. Chandrashekar, Gautam Maddineni, Sri Harsha Boppana, Manaswitha Thota, C. David Mintz, Sachin Sravan Kumar Komati, Sai Lakshmi Prasanna Komati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying patients at high risk for colorectal polyp recurrence remains an unmet need in endoscopic practice. Conventional guidelines rely on polyp size and histologic grade but often misclassify borderline cases. By blending endoscopic image analysis with structured clinical data, a predictive model may provide more accurate, personalized surveillance recommendations and reduce unnecessary procedures. Methods: We retrospectively assembled a cohort from the Endoscopic Image and Video Dataset for Recognition of Colorectal Polyps Morphology and Pathology-v5 repository, pairing high-resolution polyp images with corresponding clinical metadata: size, morphology, dysplasia grade, and prior recurrence. We standardized clinical inputs and resize all images to 224 × 224 pixels. An EfficientNet-V2 backbone extracted radiomic features, while a fully connected network processed clinical variables. We fused these embeddings in a late-fusion stage, then applied an ensemble prediction head combining Gradient Boosting and a multilayer perceptron. We trained the model using binary cross-entropy loss, calibrated probabilities via isotonic regression, and stratified outputs into Low (36-month follow-up), Moderate (12–24 months), and High (3–6 months) risk categories. Model performance was assessed on a held-out test set using accuracy, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and test loss. SHAP analysis determined feature contributions. Results: On unseen data, the fusion ensemble achieved 91.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.932. Sensitivity measured 89.7%, specificity reached 93.5%, and test loss was 0.0013. Calibration curves showed minimal deviation between predicted and observed recurrence probabilities (Brier score 0.038). SHAP rankings consistently placed polyp size first, followed by dysplasia grade and recurrence history; image-derived textural descriptors improved discrimination in equivocal cases. Risk stratification aligned with actual recurrence rates: Low—5.4%, Moderate—23.8%, High—68.7%. Feature importance remained stable across cross-validation folds. Conclusion: By integrating endoscopic radiomics with clinical parameters, our model delivered high accuracy and reliable risk stratification for polyp recurrence. Key predictors—lesion size, histologic grade, and recurrence history—align with established risk factors, while radiomic features capture subtle image patterns. This approach offers a scalable tool to tailor surveillance intervals and may reduce unnecessary colonoscopies. Prospective validation will determine its generalizability across diverse practice settings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Applied Advanced Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.