S768 Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide for the Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Introduction: Obesity is a significant risk factor for type 2 diabetes and plays a significant role in global morbidity and mortality. While current pharmacological treatments, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), have demonstrated efficacy in weight loss and glycemic control, tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, has arisen as a viable treatment option. This study aims to investigate the evidence on comparing tirzepatide to placebo and GLP-1 RAs such as semaglutide and dulaglutide. Methods: We searched electronic databases to retrieve and include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the effect of tirzepatide for the management of obesity. The revised Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Using RevMan, risk ratios (RR) along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and standard mean differences (SMD) along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used for continuous outcomes. Results: A total of 14 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, reporting data from 9,968 patients. When comparing tirzepatide to placebo, our analysis showed a statistically significant difference favoring tirzepatide dosages of 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg for change in mean body weight (SMD -2.25; 95% CI: -2.62 to -1.88), weight reduction of ≥5% (RR 3.76; 95% CI: 3.16-4.47), weight reduction of ≥10% (RR 6.40; 95% CI: 5.00-8.19) and weight reduction of ≥15% (RR 11.32; 95% CI: 8.34-15.37). When comparing tirzepatide vs GLP-1 agonists, our meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference favoring tirzepatide dosages of 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg for change in mean body weight (SMD -2.18; 95% CI: -2.70 to -1.66), weight reduction of ≥5% (RR 2.96; 95% CI: 2.14-4.10), weight reduction of ≥10% (RR 3.25; 95% CI: 2.28-4.64), and weight reduction of ≥15% (RR 4.72; 95% CI: 2.75, 8.11). Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that tirzepatide is an effective pharmacologic option for obesity treatment, demonstrating statistically significant reductions in mean body weight and body mass index. Given its recent FDA approval for obesity, tirzepatide represents a promising advancement in obesity treatment, though further long-term studies are needed to assess sustained efficacy and long-term adverse effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130532.17598.29
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S768 Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide for the Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Ankit Bhatia, Karabi Ghose, Nadia Ahmed, Paulami Deshmukh et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

S768 Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide for the Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Ankit Bhatia, Karabi Ghose, Nadia Ahmed, Paulami Deshmukh, Maurya Patel, Sean Ghose, Muhammad Ayyan, Muhammad Moazzam, Kebire Gofar, David Losier, Monica Gaurdian, Cara Mohammad
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a significant risk factor for type 2 diabetes and plays a significant role in global morbidity and mortality. While current pharmacological treatments, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), have demonstrated efficacy in weight loss and glycemic control, tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, has arisen as a viable treatment option. This study aims to investigate the evidence on comparing tirzepatide to placebo and GLP-1 RAs such as semaglutide and dulaglutide. Methods: We searched electronic databases to retrieve and include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the effect of tirzepatide for the management of obesity. The revised Cochrane’s risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Using RevMan, risk ratios (RR) along with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for dichotomous outcomes, and standard mean differences (SMD) along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used for continuous outcomes. Results: A total of 14 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, reporting data from 9,968 patients. When comparing tirzepatide to placebo, our analysis showed a statistically significant difference favoring tirzepatide dosages of 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg for change in mean body weight (SMD -2.25; 95% CI: -2.62 to -1.88), weight reduction of ≥5% (RR 3.76; 95% CI: 3.16-4.47), weight reduction of ≥10% (RR 6.40; 95% CI: 5.00-8.19) and weight reduction of ≥15% (RR 11.32; 95% CI: 8.34-15.37). When comparing tirzepatide vs GLP-1 agonists, our meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference favoring tirzepatide dosages of 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg for change in mean body weight (SMD -2.18; 95% CI: -2.70 to -1.66), weight reduction of ≥5% (RR 2.96; 95% CI: 2.14-4.10), weight reduction of ≥10% (RR 3.25; 95% CI: 2.28-4.64), and weight reduction of ≥15% (RR 4.72; 95% CI: 2.75, 8.11). Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that tirzepatide is an effective pharmacologic option for obesity treatment, demonstrating statistically significant reductions in mean body weight and body mass index. Given its recent FDA approval for obesity, tirzepatide represents a promising advancement in obesity treatment, though further long-term studies are needed to assess sustained efficacy and long-term adverse effects.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.