S784 Efficacy of Bowel Regimen on GLP1-RA-Induced Constipation

Introduction: The class of long acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) has become prevalent in modern medical practice. Their effects on delayed gastric emptying have been increasingly concerning, particularly in regard to procedures. This delayed gastric emptying with GLP1-RAs commonly result in constipation as a common side effect. Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of various bowel regimen treatments in patients who developed constipation after starting GLP-1 RA therapy. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study in the outpatient setting was performed to evaluate the effects of various bowel regimens on GLP-1 induced constipation. Data was queried utilizing an electronic patient data registry and included information on patient demographics, medication usage, and outcome variables. Statistical analyses comprised descriptive statistics, chi-square testing were used to address the primary study endpoints. A post hoc analysis for their respective primary statistical analyses for head-to-head comparison of different bowel regimens. Results: Our cohort consisted of 410 patients who received one of nine GLP-1 RAs and one of nine bowel regimens. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of diabetes, patient age, sex, baseline constipation, and specific type of GLP-1 RA on the odds of developing constipation after both GLP-1 RA use and subsequent bowel regimen initiation. The results revealed that younger age and usage of post-GLP-1 RA laxative were the only factors that reduced risk of constipation, odds ratio (OR) 0.977, (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.959-0.996) and OR 0.431, (95% CI 0.279-0.663) respectively. Chi-square testing did not show a significant difference in constipation reduction between bowel regimens P = 0.182. Proportional z-score analysis for rates of GLP-1 RA induced constipation by bowel regimen was significant at P < 0.05. Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences among various bowel regimens with most superior to psyllium. Conclusion: As GLP-1 RA becomes increasingly prevalent in our society, their use is typically associated with worsening constipation. Although there was no significant difference observed between specific GLP-1 RA resulting in causing constipation or bowel regimen to improve constipation. We did identify most bowel regimen were more superior compared to psyllium.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130596.61749.e8
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S784 Efficacy of Bowel Regimen on GLP1-RA-Induced Constipation

J. Curran Henson, Meer A. Ali, Suria Devarapalli, Benjamin Blaske
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S784 Efficacy of Bowel Regimen on GLP1-RA-Induced Constipation

J. Curran Henson, Meer A. Ali, Suria Devarapalli, Benjamin Blaske
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The class of long acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) has become prevalent in modern medical practice. Their effects on delayed gastric emptying have been increasingly concerning, particularly in regard to procedures. This delayed gastric emptying with GLP1-RAs commonly result in constipation as a common side effect. Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of various bowel regimen treatments in patients who developed constipation after starting GLP-1 RA therapy. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study in the outpatient setting was performed to evaluate the effects of various bowel regimens on GLP-1 induced constipation. Data was queried utilizing an electronic patient data registry and included information on patient demographics, medication usage, and outcome variables. Statistical analyses comprised descriptive statistics, chi-square testing were used to address the primary study endpoints. A post hoc analysis for their respective primary statistical analyses for head-to-head comparison of different bowel regimens. Results: Our cohort consisted of 410 patients who received one of nine GLP-1 RAs and one of nine bowel regimens. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of diabetes, patient age, sex, baseline constipation, and specific type of GLP-1 RA on the odds of developing constipation after both GLP-1 RA use and subsequent bowel regimen initiation. The results revealed that younger age and usage of post-GLP-1 RA laxative were the only factors that reduced risk of constipation, odds ratio (OR) 0.977, (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.959-0.996) and OR 0.431, (95% CI 0.279-0.663) respectively. Chi-square testing did not show a significant difference in constipation reduction between bowel regimens P = 0.182. Proportional z-score analysis for rates of GLP-1 RA induced constipation by bowel regimen was significant at P < 0.05. Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences among various bowel regimens with most superior to psyllium. Conclusion: As GLP-1 RA becomes increasingly prevalent in our society, their use is typically associated with worsening constipation. Although there was no significant difference observed between specific GLP-1 RA resulting in causing constipation or bowel regimen to improve constipation. We did identify most bowel regimen were more superior compared to psyllium.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.