S690 Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in New York City: An Analysis of the 2021-2023 Community Health Survey

Introduction: The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a population level cross-sectional survey in the largest and most diverse city in the US. It has previously been used to measure colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by colonoscopy among those aged 50+ years. We present updated screening data that captures fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) as well as colonoscopy use in the age 45+ population. Methods: We extracted data from the 2021-2023 CHS, weighted to the adult residential population per the American Community Survey and age-adjusted to the US 2000 Standard Population during analysis. Up-to-date screening was self-reported and defined as colonoscopy within the past 10 years or FOBT/FIT within the past year. Results: Up-to-date CRC screening in NYC increased from 63.9% in 2021 to 69.2% in 2023 (P = 0.001), with similar improvements in colonoscopy (60.9% to 64.9%, P = 0.014) and FOBT/FIT (11.1% to 14.0%, P = 0.014) uptake. In 2023, individuals aged 65-74 had higher screening than those aged 45-64 overall (84.6% vs 62.9%, P < 0.001), by colonoscopy (79.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001), and by FOBT/FIT (18.0% vs 13.4%, P = 0.04). Consistently higher screening was also observed for those with a primary care provider and who received a flu vaccine in the past year. Overall and colonoscopy screening were higher for individuals who were married vs never married, gay/lesbian vs straight, had healthcare coverage, had no children in the household, had excellent vs poor health, and engaged in anal sex. Notably, colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT uptake differed for several variables. Compared to White individuals, Asian/Pacific Islander individuals had lower colonoscopy (67.1% vs 59.0%, P = 0.02) but higher FOBT/FIT (9.5% vs 15.8%, P = 0.01) use, with no difference in overall screening rates (69.8% vs 65.9%, P = 0.27). Higher colonoscopy but lower FOBT/FIT uptake was also observed for individuals who were US-born, more affluent, and college graduates vs those who did not complete high school. There were no differences by sex, gender identify, borough of residence, employment status, or body mass index. Conclusion: CRC screening in NYC has continued to improve overall, but disparities persist in the younger, poorer, less educated, and uninsured populations. While it’s unclear whether the differential uptake for colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT in some groups are related to access or preference, offering a choice in screening options may improve overall uptake.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130220.06599.b9
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S690 Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in New York City: An Analysis of the 2021-2023 Community Health Survey

Peter S. Liang, Nneka Lundy De La Cruz, Cynthia Anderson, Abraham Z. Cheloff et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S690 Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in New York City: An Analysis of the 2021-2023 Community Health Survey

Peter S. Liang, Nneka Lundy De La Cruz, Cynthia Anderson, Abraham Z. Cheloff, Tony Williams
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a population level cross-sectional survey in the largest and most diverse city in the US. It has previously been used to measure colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by colonoscopy among those aged 50+ years. We present updated screening data that captures fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) as well as colonoscopy use in the age 45+ population. Methods: We extracted data from the 2021-2023 CHS, weighted to the adult residential population per the American Community Survey and age-adjusted to the US 2000 Standard Population during analysis. Up-to-date screening was self-reported and defined as colonoscopy within the past 10 years or FOBT/FIT within the past year. Results: Up-to-date CRC screening in NYC increased from 63.9% in 2021 to 69.2% in 2023 (P = 0.001), with similar improvements in colonoscopy (60.9% to 64.9%, P = 0.014) and FOBT/FIT (11.1% to 14.0%, P = 0.014) uptake. In 2023, individuals aged 65-74 had higher screening than those aged 45-64 overall (84.6% vs 62.9%, P < 0.001), by colonoscopy (79.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001), and by FOBT/FIT (18.0% vs 13.4%, P = 0.04). Consistently higher screening was also observed for those with a primary care provider and who received a flu vaccine in the past year. Overall and colonoscopy screening were higher for individuals who were married vs never married, gay/lesbian vs straight, had healthcare coverage, had no children in the household, had excellent vs poor health, and engaged in anal sex. Notably, colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT uptake differed for several variables. Compared to White individuals, Asian/Pacific Islander individuals had lower colonoscopy (67.1% vs 59.0%, P = 0.02) but higher FOBT/FIT (9.5% vs 15.8%, P = 0.01) use, with no difference in overall screening rates (69.8% vs 65.9%, P = 0.27). Higher colonoscopy but lower FOBT/FIT uptake was also observed for individuals who were US-born, more affluent, and college graduates vs those who did not complete high school. There were no differences by sex, gender identify, borough of residence, employment status, or body mass index. Conclusion: CRC screening in NYC has continued to improve overall, but disparities persist in the younger, poorer, less educated, and uninsured populations. While it’s unclear whether the differential uptake for colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT in some groups are related to access or preference, offering a choice in screening options may improve overall uptake.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.