S727 Machine Learning-Assisted Gene Risk Score for Calories to Satiation Predicts Weight Loss Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is among the most performed bariatric procedures. Recently, we developed a genetic risk score to predict calories to satiation (CTSGRS) (PMID 38826309). We aimed to evaluate whether CTSGRS status is associated with weight loss after SG. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Biobank is a large-scale biorepository of adult patients with genetic whole-exome data. From the Biobank, we identified 102 patients with a history of SG and genetic information available. We estimated the gene risk score as a continuous value and dichotomized it at 0.5 into High CTSGRS and Low CTSGRS. Our primary endpoint was total body weight loss percentage (%TBWL) at 60 months. Secondary outcomes included %TBWL at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months. We used a repeated measures mixed model (REML) to analyze longitudinal %TBWL. The model included random intercepts for each patient and fixed effects for CTSGRS group (high vs low), age, sex, and baseline weight. We estimated least‐squares means (LSM) and standard errors (SEM) and used Tukey Honest Significant Difference for post-hoc multiple comparisons. Results: Baseline age, sex, and body mass index were similar between High (n = 42) and Low (n = 60) CTSGRS groups; only baseline weight was higher in High CTSGRS (127.7 ± 30.5 vs 116.0 ± 18.6 kg; P = 0.030). In the mixed‐effects model, the CTSGRS × timepoint interaction was highly significant [F(10, 700) = 2.78; P < 0.001], indicating that weight‐loss trajectories differed by CTSGRS group over time. Patients with a High CTSGRS consistently lost more weight at each timepoint. At 60 months, %TBWL was -29.4 ± 2.1% in High CTSGRS vs -22.1 ± 1.3% in Low CTSGRS (Padj = 0.047). Conclusion: Patients with a High CTSGRS demonstrated significantly greater %TBWL up to 5 years postoperatively. A polygenic background, represented by the CTSGRS, might influence weight loss outcomes in sleeve gastrectomy. Incorporating genetic predictions may help tailor follow-up interventions and optimize postoperative outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130368.93593.c0
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S727 Machine Learning-Assisted Gene Risk Score for Calories to Satiation Predicts Weight Loss Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Jose L. Villamarin, Omar M. Ghanem, Diego Añazco, Andres Acosta et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S727 Machine Learning-Assisted Gene Risk Score for Calories to Satiation Predicts Weight Loss Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Jose L. Villamarin, Omar M. Ghanem, Diego Añazco, Andres Acosta, Alejandro Campos, Thomas W Fredrick, Lizeth Cifuentes, Tim O’Connor, María Espinosa, Wissam Ghusn, Jacob Bierstedt
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is among the most performed bariatric procedures. Recently, we developed a genetic risk score to predict calories to satiation (CTSGRS) (PMID 38826309). We aimed to evaluate whether CTSGRS status is associated with weight loss after SG. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Biobank is a large-scale biorepository of adult patients with genetic whole-exome data. From the Biobank, we identified 102 patients with a history of SG and genetic information available. We estimated the gene risk score as a continuous value and dichotomized it at 0.5 into High CTSGRS and Low CTSGRS. Our primary endpoint was total body weight loss percentage (%TBWL) at 60 months. Secondary outcomes included %TBWL at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months. We used a repeated measures mixed model (REML) to analyze longitudinal %TBWL. The model included random intercepts for each patient and fixed effects for CTSGRS group (high vs low), age, sex, and baseline weight. We estimated least‐squares means (LSM) and standard errors (SEM) and used Tukey Honest Significant Difference for post-hoc multiple comparisons. Results: Baseline age, sex, and body mass index were similar between High (n = 42) and Low (n = 60) CTSGRS groups; only baseline weight was higher in High CTSGRS (127.7 ± 30.5 vs 116.0 ± 18.6 kg; P = 0.030). In the mixed‐effects model, the CTSGRS × timepoint interaction was highly significant [F(10, 700) = 2.78; P < 0.001], indicating that weight‐loss trajectories differed by CTSGRS group over time. Patients with a High CTSGRS consistently lost more weight at each timepoint. At 60 months, %TBWL was -29.4 ± 2.1% in High CTSGRS vs -22.1 ± 1.3% in Low CTSGRS (Padj = 0.047). Conclusion: Patients with a High CTSGRS demonstrated significantly greater %TBWL up to 5 years postoperatively. A polygenic background, represented by the CTSGRS, might influence weight loss outcomes in sleeve gastrectomy. Incorporating genetic predictions may help tailor follow-up interventions and optimize postoperative outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.