S730 Assessing the Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis in Patients on GLP-1 Agonists

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are utilized in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity. While these agents have been implicated in the development of acute pancreatitis, most large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses have not found a statistically significant increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) in patients without a history of prior AP. This study aims to characterize the clinical features and potential risk factors associated with recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients initiated on GLP-1RA therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified patients with a diagnosis of AP who were subsequently prescribed a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) prior to 3/15/2024. The primary outcome was recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), defined as any AP episode occurring after GLP-1RA initiation. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, body mass index, suspected etiology of the initial AP episode, time interval from GLP-1RA initiation to RAP, diabetes status, and peak lipase levels during the initial AP episode. We employed Fisher's exact test to compare baseline characteristics between patients with and without RAP, and logistic regression to determine odds ratios and identify independent risk factors associated with RAP development. Results: Of the 131 patients, 16 (12.2%) experienced recurrent pancreatitis after starting GLP-1RA therapy. Patients with recurrence had a mean age of 58.8 years and were on GLP-1RAs for a mean duration of 23.6 months. In univariate analysis, age <65 years was significantly associated with recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 5.78, 95% confidence interval. [CI]: 1.26–26.59). In multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sex, BMI, T2DM status, lipase level, duration of GLP-1RA exposure, and pancreatitis etiology, age <65 remained an independent predictor of recurrence (adjusted OR 8.05, 95% CI: 1.30–50.08). No other variables were significantly associated with recurrence in the adjusted model. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with prior pancreatitis, recurrence after GLP-1RA initiation was uncommon. Younger age (<65 years) was significantly associated with increased odds of recurrence, even after adjusting for relevant covariates. These findings underscore the importance of cautious use and close monitoring of GLP-1RAs in younger patients with a history of pancreatitis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130380.47233.e9
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S730 Assessing the Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis in Patients on GLP-1 Agonists

Nikhil Reddy, Keerthana Kesavarapu, Arvind Bussetty, Andrew Wang et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S730 Assessing the Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis in Patients on GLP-1 Agonists

Nikhil Reddy, Keerthana Kesavarapu, Arvind Bussetty, Andrew Wang, Alexander Chen, Debra Scheiner
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are utilized in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity. While these agents have been implicated in the development of acute pancreatitis, most large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses have not found a statistically significant increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) in patients without a history of prior AP. This study aims to characterize the clinical features and potential risk factors associated with recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients initiated on GLP-1RA therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified patients with a diagnosis of AP who were subsequently prescribed a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) prior to 3/15/2024. The primary outcome was recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), defined as any AP episode occurring after GLP-1RA initiation. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, body mass index, suspected etiology of the initial AP episode, time interval from GLP-1RA initiation to RAP, diabetes status, and peak lipase levels during the initial AP episode. We employed Fisher's exact test to compare baseline characteristics between patients with and without RAP, and logistic regression to determine odds ratios and identify independent risk factors associated with RAP development. Results: Of the 131 patients, 16 (12.2%) experienced recurrent pancreatitis after starting GLP-1RA therapy. Patients with recurrence had a mean age of 58.8 years and were on GLP-1RAs for a mean duration of 23.6 months. In univariate analysis, age <65 years was significantly associated with recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 5.78, 95% confidence interval. [CI]: 1.26–26.59). In multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sex, BMI, T2DM status, lipase level, duration of GLP-1RA exposure, and pancreatitis etiology, age <65 remained an independent predictor of recurrence (adjusted OR 8.05, 95% CI: 1.30–50.08). No other variables were significantly associated with recurrence in the adjusted model. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with prior pancreatitis, recurrence after GLP-1RA initiation was uncommon. Younger age (<65 years) was significantly associated with increased odds of recurrence, even after adjusting for relevant covariates. These findings underscore the importance of cautious use and close monitoring of GLP-1RAs in younger patients with a history of pancreatitis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.